None, but the M42 at 4.7 would be much harder to use.
It would be at lethal 3.7 in the down tier and still taking CAS down at 5.7 .To be honest I dont care where they put it just give the thing more ammo
Try to take down a bomber at high altitude at 4.7 with 4x 20 mm. Not so easy.
Specially at top tier.
What point are you trying to make here? Do you honestly thing Gaijin with give the M42 3000 rounds of ammo and leave it at it’s current BR? You are dreaming.
No, but putting it at 4.7 would be damn stupid.
It is at 3.7 already with heavily nerfed ammo and plays at 4.7 in the up tier all the time so give it huge amounts of ammo and what do you think Gaijin will do with it? Talk about damn stupid. C’mon , have a think about it.
They would level it up for sure, but having it at base 4.7 wouldn’t be the same as sometimes finding yourself at 4.7 uptier.
Do you seriously think the Devs would give it much higher ammo and leave it where it is? Do you not think that if they did that then this forum would be full of non-Italians screaming Blue Murder? The US mains would be crying into their Hamburgers over it.
Honestly, it would be fine to give him more ammo and put him at 4.0, but not give him an inhuman amount of ammo and raise it to 4.7.
I would give it more ammo and leave it where it is but we know how this game works.
I play Italy a lot and love it but Gaijin keep hammering us with the BR. Look at the Breda, how that went from 4 to 4-7. Went from one line up to another.
I would actually rather have the M42 with much higher ammo at 5.0 that the Leopard to be honest if I had to chosse.
I would prefer M42 at 3.3 with same ammo as now and Leofors at the same level as now.
1 Like
I think that in some tech trees some vehicles need to be OP to give the nation a chance overall. Like the Wythern at 4-5 .UK needs that plane to make playing UK in anyway fun or competitive and I would drop the Skink to 4.7.
Italy has no heavy tanks low down, so a good SPAA takes up the slack. That is the way WT works and so many players miss it. They don’t see how unrelated vehicles balance a line up or tech tree overall. You lose on the swings but gain on the roundabouts as they say.
1 Like
I hadn’t even thought about that. It’s an idea (I miss my perfect lineup at 3.3)
1 Like
I too had a great full line up at around 4 with the premiums and M42 and a great line up at around 5 with the Italian R3 T20 FA-HS as SPAA . Then they jumped the latter to 5-7 and it’s nowhere. Now its all a sad mash up. They do it with so many line ups. Its like one guy does something then another different guy comes along and just F**** it up.
I think to get SPAA to work at the WW2 /Early cold war levels it has to be pitched lower than its BR suggests so if its 4.3 drop it to 4 and will work and players may use them more to balance the other issue of CAS destroying games. Start messing with it and it leave the player with nothing at either BR in a line up. France and Israel are a fine example of out of sync SPAA in terms of BR. French DCA is in a BR of it’s own in some ways and the Israelis SPAA is 4.3 to the next vehicle being 6.0. Bit of a mess.
I don’t think the Devs even consider a players line up when they shift BR only the “Holy” statistics.
2 Likes
I think the Turkey has enough original vehicles(prototypes+ concepts ) for its own tech tree
April Fool’s Day Event :P
I am not sure about that but USA could have benefitted from turkish SPAAs.