You use AI and charge $90?

The opposite seems to be true since it seems like AI only was used on the in-game design, which has ‘correct’ flags. It’s theoretically possible that they translated the CG model’s texture to the in-game tank with AI and it failed to account for the intent behind the flags looking like that because it’s a computer that copies the placement of pixels in image files and physically can’t understand these things, but AI 3d models and textures are uh. Not exactly great. and by not exactly great I mean ‘basically unusable and prohibitively expensive’ so that’s unlikely

You’re insanely wrong. Almost every field outside of medicine that has tried to incorporate LLMs into the workflow has reported efficiency going DOWN. AI “Art” is a soulless abomination that appeals to people who think the product is the most important part of anything and AI writing is so easy to spot it’s not even funny. LLMs CONSTANTLY get questions wrong (wow who would have guessed that using the entire unfiltered internet as a dataset would have problems) and nobody wants data centers built in their towns. You bought into the hype like a fool and you think that the prices of all computer related hardware going up is a good thing despite the fact that AI is insanely unpopular with the general public and continues to get even more unpopular because it poisons water supplies, contributes heavily to climate change, and just makes misinformation and disinformation much easier to spread.

2 Likes

AI farms are spending insane amounts of resources to create brainrot slop that’s funny only to 13 year olds.
Great technological step.

1 Like

the tank model does not match any of the Challenger 2s

take a look at the blocks on the side of the OES/Emily then back to that image

Not to mention it being trained on copyrighted stuff without consent or payment.

Confidently incorrect - AI.

2 Likes

Don’t forget! They’re also poisoning towns and making gaming (and computing in general) more expensive! All for propaganda that your grandpa eats for breakfast and “funny” videos.

This is most likely human error in the modelling process, since AI can’t make 3d models and the design is too consistent from multiple angles for the images themselves to be generated.

This actually might explain why they had to remake parts of the skin for the in-game model, if the model they made for the short was itself wrong?

All your points is about AI getting used wrongly.
Also can u provide a source about the poisoning

AI farms using ridiculous amounts of water and electricity to create literal slop, while residents are forced to pay higher bills just because of that. Not to mention sound pollution.

You see, normal people are forced to drink from paper straws and cups while those AI centers generate literal trash. It’s funny how anyone can support AI in it’s current implementation.

1 Like
  1. There is no “right” way to use AI image generation. At best you’re a scumbag who would rather save a couple bucks or some time rather than learn to draw/commission someone. At worse you’re a major corporation actively snubbing the many artists who would likely do what you want for very cheap in favor of the stealing machine.
    2.Data Centers - A Threat To Minnesota's Water | Clean Water Action AI’s water problem is worse than we thought
    People do not want data centers built in their towns.
3 Likes

There are like dozens of documentaries on YT about AI centers and their impact on the community, so I find it weird that plenty of people are still oblivious about that. I guess it’s better to doomscroll on Tiktok for hours.

1 Like

Why? AI is just software. Do you refuse to buy anything from anyone who uses computer graphics programs to produce the art and text on their packaging or products?

this is a false equivalence and you know it. AI generation has almost zero human input in the process. You prompt and then the LLM generates some slop for you.

Digital artists are still putting in the work. They’re making the lines and doing the shading. Or does art not count as “real” art unless it’s on paper or canvas.

I still do not exactly see the issue here

The Digital artists are still putting in the work. They are just using AI tools to save time and effort. No executives at Gaijin are producing 3D models and skins for WT tanks and planes I promise you. Don’t be a luddite.

Again this is not an issue of AI, it is of bad companys

Then cope. if you cant have a rational discussion it’s a you issue. If you can’t go with the time then stay back

ok let’s take all of the ethical and environmental arguments away.

Why are you content with things you enjoy slowly getting infested with slop? What’s wrong with wanting good quality products? Why are you ok with slop in your games? Do you WANT the quality of everything you use to get worse?

I’m friends with many, many digital artists, and no the ones worth their salt are not using generative AI tools to “save time”. Artists ADORE stick figure renditions of what you want, they don’t want slop.

1 Like

the cat ate my homework and i sent my friends papers on accident

1 Like

And those are the ones who are going to be unemployed too.