no, squadron vehicle or event
Is the same logic applied to ground vehicles? Lots of experimental tanks in USSR tech tree is all
1 Like
Most of us could get paper stealth, FCAS,NGAD,FS2020 etc. they are just as viable with the current stealths as everything is classified anyway.
Well, not really but I mean we barely know anything for a fact about current so they would have to be majority made up stats.
only in historical configuration without radar or weapons or flares
We already have non historical prototypes like the yak 141 in game.
Would not be a huge surprise to see a yf 23 equiped for combat.
Especially since that plane is kinda famous nowadays.
Relevant:
I see that the YF-23 can only carry 3 AIM-120D-3 and 2 AIM-9X, so can it reduce Br to zero like the F-22?
It can’t carry either since both didn’t exist for years after they stopped flying the YF-23
1 Like
the yf-23 didn’t even have bays for sidewinders
1 Like
they cannot add the yf-23 to war thunder, they need to add proposed f-23 instead. the problem is that the f-23 is magnitudes times more fiction than something like the yak-141, at least for yak 141 we knew exactly which and how many weapons it would carry, and there’s even pictures of it carrying said missiles. yf-23? It ain’t carry stuff
for example, here is an f-23 proposal (not yf-23). It wouldve had chaff/flares and actual functioning weapon pylons
diagram with potential 2 120s
the yf23 was cancelled before the AIM-120A entered service
yf-22 fired aim 120s, it wasn’t a part of the requirements but aim 120s were in testing since the 80s
mind blown
this thing should be added with the su-75, theyre very similar (both prototypes)
OFC su-75 would be leagues better but in terms of general shape and design they follow the same principles
more functional than yak 141, or at least just as
The Yak 41 at least could move* itself at the airshow, not just sit and pretend it’s real when it could be made of vodka, dreams and lies
wdym?