We almost had that, except entitled f*cks made up all kinds of excuses about how it would break the whole game, so now we have APHE still breaking the good part of the game and having every single shell that can’t one shot stupidly like that be called bad. We don’t even know if Gaijin ever will revisit that vote.
6 Likes
Yeah Yeah! That’s what I mean! Most Big-shot planes either (A) have crap maneuverability HS 129 (duck),
Ju 87 G1&2 and the P.108. or (B) have only soild shot that requires really good aim and/or a lot of shots.
P 39, P 63 (the yellow one), etc.
4 Likes
I mean I DID see my Panther A (6.0) get molested by a Yak-9. I was like, “what are these little hails falling? Wait is that a Yak------”.
2 Likes
AD-4 at least needs some skills to (A) aim the rockets (B) use the 20mils to attack tanks (C) maneuver since its not a fighter with an orbital strike cannon that fires High Velocity Anti-Tank Armor-piercing ballistic Capped Fin-Stabilized-Laser-Guided Gaijin-Bugged munitions.
14 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
dont forget P63 can also bombs and rockets so they can kill every tank and in my opinion most important, multible spaa with a short attack due to the bomb…
All bombs can kill all tanks mate. But that is one or maybe at most three bombs not a few hundred rounds from a BT-7 gun.
5 Likes
LOL, the only word I know in Russian is blyat
2 Likes
That is what the YaK-9K is capable of firing. Have you not looked at the Reddit post link I put on?
And if you only know blyatt then why post that Russian doc that won’t be useful since no one understands?
2 Likes
Yeah sorry that the experienced good players did not want a change that benefits bad players to go through.
How does making the REALISTIC/SIMULATOR GAME MODE have REALISTIC SHELL PHYSICS only benefit bad players?
The only people I saw in that thread defending APHE are people arguing it’d make the game less arcade.
Solution should’ve been arcade players keep the magic APHE, realistic/sim get actual shell physics that work according to simulations and WW2 battle & test reports (ergo: solid shot and APHE have comparable results, with APHE not providing any measurable advantage of note while having greater risk of fuze failure).
10 Likes
Ah yes, ever heard of this magical thing called Google Translate?
The yak gets rolled by any relevant fighter at the br that doesn’t immediately turn with it or go into the vertical. It does not have an exceptionally good flight mode, unlike the yak 3’s
Yeah why not add fuse failure so that at least 30-50% of the APHE works like a solid shot? OR MAKE THE BELT ONLY 10% AHPE AND THE OTHER SOLID SHOTS BECAUSE WHY DO WE NEED A FIGHTER WITH A UFO FLIGHT ABILITY ONE-TAP A WHOLE TIGER WITH A LASER BT-7 CANNON?
1 Like
Then why don’t you do it for us since your defending a point? Like I got a proof (as a reddit video) so at least make yours readable for us since why would we bother anyways?
HUH? Then how does it one shot my Do 217 E-2 from 2 kilometers away? And how come I saw a Yak-9 rack up 9 kills in a RB match? And HOW does it beat Japanese planes by SOMEHOW coming from their six and winning them in a turnfight? PLEASE EXPLAIN MR.I LOVE THE YAK SO KEEP THE RUSSIA BIAS?
2 Likes
So. War thunder is firstly an arcade game. Realistic and simulator modes differ from ab by excluding some or all markers and restricting your viewpoint. The core of this is still an arcade game. That is also why things like track and barrel repairs taking ten seconds is possible as wel as another slew of things that are not as they are in real life. How the aphe changes will benefit only bad players was extensively discussed in the thread at the time so I will only be giving through the main points. Bad players do not know how to properly peek and aim at weakspots. Good players do. If you have bad players surviving a shot they should not be due to them not reacting on time, and then they get the option of shooting back because they were not killed by a well-placed shot, that is bad. Aphe currently rewards good aim. If you can hit cupolas, mg ports etc you get rewarded for your skill in aiming with a kill. If the aphe changes went through, some tanks would be noticeably better than others. Tiger 1’s for instance become completely immune to shermans for instance, while retaining the ability to overpressure and then your aphe change is worthless because one shot still kills due to overpressure.
Why should I? It’s the original source. If you can’t read Russian, translate it.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
As for the first one, it has good guns like people have said here. You aren’t in a relevant fighter, you were most likely not doing anything to evade his shells. Pick something relevant to complain about please. As to how one can rack up 9 kills in a game, it’s the same as any other slightly cas-focused fighter. He was most likely uncontested by air, in which case he has the best chance of living. Aircraft should always win against spaa so there, that’s explained.
Leave a bf109g6, f4u4 etcetera alone and you’ll see the exact same thing.