You said it’s not there in the sentence prior to this claim.
Also prove that the Typhoon was never put into service.
1 Like
??
I remember you’ve been talking a lot in the Eurofighter thread. How can you not remember that we found the manufacturer of a mount rail and it stated that it’s compatible with AMRAAMs such as aim-120. it’s just not used this way because of the “mission” restrictions.
1 Like
Oh, you didn’t remember, I see.
We found a render by the manufacturer of a potential thing in the Typhoon topic, but that’s it.
Not only that, but Typhoon is a production aircraft.
As for your argument of conjecture; conjecture isn’t evidence.
1 Like
compression is so dogshit at these tiers that 141 could gain r-73 and not move in br
1 Like
This Prototype that UK gamers doesn’t want much was even show in Farnborough Airshow.
How come they denial a piece of art they also enjoy so close?
1 Like
No IRST, No payload, probably no radar here as well. Ok, you can have it.
1 Like
The Yak-141 can be balanced with its full armament.
There are similar planes with 4 Fox-3s on 13.0.
The Yak would most likely go to 13.3, it has a far better fm than the harriers at 13.0
1 Like
Its current loadout is balanced for 12.7.
1 Like
Not only the Harrier has a Fox-3 at 13.0, but also the F-4F KWS LV, the Tornado F.3 late, the JA37DI and the J-8F.
Ah, tbh i had forgotten that those sat so low in BR. Still, if the YAK received the superior R-77/1 it might go to 13.3 anyway. With standard R-77s it would be fine at 13.0.
The JA37DI at minimum is inferior to the Yak-141.
Tornado F3 Late is inferior in high-altitude BVR as well as the F-4F ICE, and those are under-BR’d IMO. At least due to compression.