Brimstone on Harrier GR.7 when. XD
1 Like
Super Hornet with brimstones when?
2 Likes
No, it doesn’t. Also that reasoning is literally why Ho-229 is allowed to be in the game.
Provide proof of the turret being functional.
@Stockholm_Blend
1- Prove that Harrier GR7 isn’t in service.
2- That’s likely GR-9.
Man… you are taking everything seriously :|
It was on the Joke level. Come on.
Yes, it was GR.9
Still, there is no GR.9 (in-game)
And there is another example of Jaguar GR.1A with a TIALD pod.
(If I know right, the TIALD pod came from a slightly later variant.)
Soo… If Gaijin goes haywire enough to make ‘What-if’ kind of shit more and more.
There will be Brimmy-armed GR.7 or AIM-120 armed F-14D :/
Not fair what? You don’t gonna use it right. It’s not your business how people have fun with the real payload was planned and tested. Winning because people want to be happy?
Wood was tested. You want the real payload? Lets remove the missiles and add wood.
I fail to see how him not able to get a flakpanzer because it wasn’t mounted to a body equates to not having to use the 141.
I guess the best way to put Thodin’s point what makes your aircraft so special it deserves a manufactured armament but other nations can not.
Personally I would have used the EAP as an example instead of the Flakpanzer.
3 Likes
Brother we can’t get a 2 more AMRAAMs for EF just because there’s no straight forward statement from the manufacturer. Even though hard point compatibility is there, official arts and layouts state that, but no… I’m not even talking about all german phantoms being unable to carry more than 2 Maverics… They got a damn IRST on their plane, Eurofighter can mount it at any time and there’s a couple of them that were installed in german EF, but no, no IRST for the germany. You’re not getting R-77 and anything else on your yak or we’ll make it into a precedent and make this br bracket unplayable for you and any soviet aircraft.
Lol!! I like this
You said it’s not there in the sentence prior to this claim.
Also prove that the Typhoon was never put into service.
1 Like
??
I remember you’ve been talking a lot in the Eurofighter thread. How can you not remember that we found the manufacturer of a mount rail and it stated that it’s compatible with AMRAAMs such as aim-120. it’s just not used this way because of the “mission” restrictions.
1 Like
Oh, you didn’t remember, I see.
We found a render by the manufacturer of a potential thing in the Typhoon topic, but that’s it.
Not only that, but Typhoon is a production aircraft.
As for your argument of conjecture; conjecture isn’t evidence.
1 Like
compression is so dogshit at these tiers that 141 could gain r-73 and not move in br
1 Like
This Prototype that UK gamers doesn’t want much was even show in Farnborough Airshow.
How come they denial a piece of art they also enjoy so close?
1 Like
No IRST, No payload, probably no radar here as well. Ok, you can have it.
1 Like
The Yak-141 can be balanced with its full armament.
There are similar planes with 4 Fox-3s on 13.0.
The Yak would most likely go to 13.3, it has a far better fm than the harriers at 13.0
1 Like
Its current loadout is balanced for 12.7.
1 Like
Not only the Harrier has a Fox-3 at 13.0, but also the F-4F KWS LV, the Tornado F.3 late, the JA37DI and the J-8F.
Ah, tbh i had forgotten that those sat so low in BR. Still, if the YAK received the superior R-77/1 it might go to 13.3 anyway. With standard R-77s it would be fine at 13.0.
The JA37DI at minimum is inferior to the Yak-141.
Tornado F3 Late is inferior in high-altitude BVR as well as the F-4F ICE, and those are under-BR’d IMO. At least due to compression.