I think you might have forgotten that the PGZ gets access to the AHEAD ammunition, and peeforms quite a bit stronger in anti air purposes compared to the other versions.
Spaas mainly get balanced around their anti air capability. And here the pgz is steonger then standard gepard variants
just for clarities sake for any following persons.
The gepard and the other clones, never used AHEAD, so they cant receive it, they physicaly are unable to programm the ammunition.
The Gepard1a2 that being said is missing its main ammunition the FAPDS that being said
they can act as spaa WITHOUT the ap ammo. In fact they’d be better spaa without the ap ammo because they would be lower BR and face easier CAS targets.
IT’S A GAME. Every single thing from real life does NOT need to be included. Tiger IIs never faced cold-war light tanks with HEATFS in real life but they do in WT.
thats assuming HE damage actualy works, but it seems to turn on or off every update, so they do need non HE rounds so they can do some damage when HE isnt working
Lemme tell you a secret.
The I stands for incendirary.
You cant remove then. They are used for the easier for easier hits as well trough the faster velocity. Like i said. Its the whole point the gepard1a2 even happend.
People are already crying about gepard anti air capabilities as well, they wont go down just cause u remove an ammunition type.
Fun fact, one of the primary upgrades during the NDV to 1A2 was the use of new V0 measuring-coils, which could measure muzzle velocities of up to ~1500m/s.
This was done specifically for the FAPDS (DM 33) ammunition, which was to replace all other types available/used at that time;
35 x 228 mm MSD Type HEI [DM 21]
35 x 228 mm MLD Type HE-T [DM 31]
35 x 228 mm PLD Type APHEI-T [DM 13 A1]
I’m not sure whether the TLD Type APDS-T [DM 23] was to be replaced aswell, I only know that oerlikon also offered 35 x 228 APFSDS-T as alternative.
From what I can tell, the FAPDS thingy never really went anywhere, or atleast didnt entirely replace the other types.
DM 31 was still in storage and Rheinmetall restarted the production of the ammo after moving the plant from Switzerland to germany.
The first ammo-delivery of 35x228 ammunition consisted of;
100.000x HE-T [DM 31]
100.000x APDS-T [DM 23]
not just the one you listed but others to like the Chieftan marksman, falcon, za-35, praga, zsu-57, are so overpowered for no reason ive been penned by falcons frontally while I was in a patton, there’s no reason they should be this powerful knowing gaijin has nerfed other tanks for no reason like the m26 pershing it was amazing at 6.3 and you had a good lineup in that B.R range to. My hate for spaa has gotten so bad that every time I kill one I mock them in chat
OK Captain obvious, I already know what “I” stands for. Your answer to my post makes zero sense for the following reasons…
This topic is about the APDS anti-tank capability. Nothing to do with issues on anti-air.
There are no “I” rounds in the APDS belt.
The belt (DM13) I mention above your response to me contains both AP-I and HE-I. That mixed belt can be used against ground units or, in a pinch, air units.
The DM11A1 belt also has “I” rounds. No one is talking about removing the “I” rounds.
Of course the BR would be tweaked if the APDS was removed. That belt gives weight to the final BR rating. Why do you think the Falcon BR was raised recently? because it was performing too well against air units?