The third document，Source:Vehicle & Power Technology，ISSN 1009-4687，Previous name：Acta Ordnance - Tanks, Armored Vehicles and Engines. An authoritative and core journal.2004.1
At present, the 8x8 wheeled armored vehicle developed in China uses the front two-axle steering mode.The minimum turning radius is 10 meters.
This is consistent with the 20 meters diameter of the turn mentioned in other sources.
Would this image be better for estimating it? The camera is at an elevated level allowing a better view of the turning circle. We already know the width of the vehicle so it should be possible to get a ‘sufficient’ estimate from it.
We understand this, but we have entered into vehicles that the data is hard to get and Gaijin themselves are taking guesses on the performance of it. Which isn’t an issue, I imagine it must be very frustrating for them to get any data on these. BUT the issue is when we provide evidence that their guesses are incorrect, we get blocked because it doesn’t meet the standards for historic bug reports. See how this is an issue? This issue is going to continue getting worse as more modern equipment is added and I think it’s time to discuss changes for historic bug reports standard of proof, that would be more productive then denying something for not meeting the guidelines but also showing strong evidence a vehicle is not performing correctly in game.
We are all civilized people. Won’t insult people for no reason. By providing evidence that something is wrong, the player is helping Gaijin improve the game. It is not our responsibility to find out what caused the error and whether the model is wrong. It is arrogant and stupid to deny objective evidence on this ground, and the logic is also untenable.It is not an insult to point this out.
Now, there is a video that is the most visual proof of a major error in the turning diameter. Two secondary sources prove it.What else is needed?
Please don’t learn what TrickZZter says the model doesn’t allow.I think all logical people agree that I don’t need to prove it.
If they focus on the issue itself, rather than the defense, my evidence should be sufficient. Otherwise, they will ask you to prove that the rut belongs to ZLT11.
🫡zlt11 need buff
Were you able to open an issue now? If not, I could open an issue on this, I think you provided all the necessary documents in this thread, right?
Still no.Do it ,please
What I can find at the moment is already here.
This happend when you try to upload some JPG format of pictures. Try convert to PNG format and you could save it.
You don’t appear to be. Could be an issue with file format like other people mentioned.
Solved, thanks!
Wow, it got deleted already. It seems they are ignoring all evidence.
Gaijin represents:
Give me a couple days to a week to dig around for additional information. Based off pictures alone, we already know it’s incorrect:
In Game:
In Real Life:
Suspension is far too low as well, it should be sitting up higher and there should be a large gap in the wheel well between the body and the wheels.
This video shows just how tight of a turn the chassis can make: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1efBGGThZeM at 2:07. I don’t know Chinese so IDK if they are saying anything about it’s performance.
This would probably be a good photo to compare with the model.
The video does not talk about its turning performance at that time, it instead is talking about the professionalism of drivers. However, the most likely way to getting this issue fixed is probably hoping somebody else will review the bug report, somebody who won’t be picking bones with every assumption necessary.
