Wrong Br placement

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
,
1

The Russian T-80U is placed at a battle rating of 11.7 while the swedish version is placed at 11.3,
The reason for this is because it doesnt have the NVD upgrade and the 3BM46 (which has 532mm penetration) now, i think that it should be moved to 10.7 or 10.3 because (ill take the T-72B for an example) it has the same round with 457mm pen, doesnt have NVD, quite similar armor and is placed at a BR of 10.3. 10.7 would be the perfect br for the Swedish T-80U.

Sweden does not have any 11.0-11.7 tanks so its very difficult to have a good lineup of tanks where one of them is 11.7, so there are two options,

Move the Swedish T-80U to 10.7 or

Add more modern swedish tanks to the game (at 11.7)

2 Likes
2

Has the same thermals, the USSR and Sweden T-80U’s are the same tank, just with a bit different shell.

And vastly better than the 10.3 T-72B, 10.7 T-80UD and 11.0 T-80UD/BE, it doesn’t need moving down to 10.7

3 Likes
3

we finally got T-80UD to 10.7 after god knows how long, and you want to put better objectively variant at the same BR?

4 Likes
4

Swedish T-80U has thermals, same as RU one.

Please don’t post stuff like this again.

8 Likes
5

What in the actual cope, I’ll not have you slander the T80 U it’s excellent and imo my more pulled vehicle at 12.7 over the last 2 years, not that I play top tier that much but I just like it’s mobility over the Leos

1 Like
6

I meant the Russian T72 does not have thermals read again pls

7

I didnt say that the t80 didnt have thermals i said the t72 didnt have thermals

8

Well its the same thing isnt it

9

…no?

UD lacks one 15mm layer on its UFP which matters when engaging tanks like Sabra (as ive been told) and UD also has different engine and transmission leading to worse mobility and lacks thermals.

1 Like
10

You might want to edit your post then because how it’s written currently you are implying that the USSR T-80U doesn’t have thermals.

2 Likes
11

Let’s move the M1A1 Abrams to 10.3 while we’re at it, I mean, it’s got the same round as the M60 120S after all.

1 Like
12

never post again

13

Yes, move the Swedish T-80U to 10.7. There is no reason Russia would have, once again, an unfair advantage.

14

No you didn’t.

15

If you read a little better maybe you would see that i meant the t72

16

I read very well. That sentence i quoted refers back to the T-80U as you never mention the T-72 at the start. You cannot refer to something you have yet to mention.

17

get better material

1 Like
18

One of a kind comparing T-80U to a T-72B calling it fair comparison and reasoning to move a T-80U to battle rating 10.7. The only thing that justify this battle rating difference between the swedish T-80 U to the russian T-80U is the lack of 3BM46 which is more than fair, 3BM42 is very reliable despite the armor penetration values. T-80UD and T-80UD/BE is at lower battle rating due having worse mobility.

19

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

1 Like
20

yes exactly that thanks

1 Like