With the addition of nuclear thunder, why not add long range Fox 3's?

Game Discussion General Discussion
,
1

For top-tier and TOP-tier only, or for aircraft that ONLY carry these long-range Fox-3s (AIM-174 B, AIM-JATM, R-37M, and the R-33). Why not, perchance, have two different spawns for aircraft that are going to carry this ordinance and aircraft that aren’t or cannot. And maybe with the idea of AzimuthZero on YouTube (link: https://youtu.be/MOFysntS8n4?si=hEe47riWHU61KO83), where the ordinance determines BR or BR range. It could make Nuclear Thunder feel more real or more modern for top tier.

Also, this could make the maps bigger and maybe add more vehicles or more SPAA to the airfields or in allied lines.

With the possible chance of them adding this, why not maybe learn from DCS with how their aircraft and ordnance work? Specifically, these long-range Fox 3’s Maybe that’ll lessen the chances of bias or “balancing” issues?

2

they probably will, but moreso for the addition of 5th gens

2 Likes
3

??? I don’t think anyone should learn DCS.

4

why not?? it is more realistic than wt lmao

5

In most aspects it isn’t, especially when it comes to radar simulation

6

well im talking more about ordinance and flight than radar

7

You didn’t even elaborate in your OP, like at face value it doesn’t really mean anything

8

It looks more realistic but under the hood it’s extremely simplified.

1 Like