This is simply a sign of disrespect toward players who have invested months of their time and money into the game. If your goal is to marginalize the German nation—under the guise of “realism”—by weakening its vehicles, then go right ahead. I’ve already uninstalled the game; you chose to ignore people who provided plenty of evidence and information. This is a game—if you’re going to insist on the concept of “realism,” then apply it consistently to all nations. You grant buffs to some countries without any basis, while you persist in nerfing Germany—even when it’s already struggling. Who would even want to play these “paper-thin” German Leopard tanks now? They’ve reached this state precisely because of constant, repeated nerfs. This level of criticism isn’t for nothing; the community invests its time and money to support your game, and in return, the tanks they’ve acquired just get weakened. Why didn’t you do this three years ago instead of now? It’s an absolute fiasco.
I was literally gonna say this
Leo 2RI during Dev server not any bugs . Barrel, Ricochet , these bugs have existed on the Germany and Italy Leo A7 for many years .If the vehicle you like has had numerous bugs due to poor workmanship for many years, and you report all of this over and over again, but only receive the developers’ indifference, who would believe that they will fix these issues “next time”? This is a top-notch vehicle, one that many players have spent a lot of time and money to obtain. In fact, the development team has already lost the trust of many people
They’ve done this to most top tier nations. Just look the leclercs, type 10, arietes (not that they’re great to begin with), challengers… etc.
They fought the US tooth and nail over hull improvements - which they then nerfed the internal bulkhead as a punishment (they have an accepted report for the bulkhead being 25mm and then reduced it to 9).
Not disputing the strength of the abrams platforms vs other nations btw - just referencing the insane amount of work that the community had to put in for a measly 16% improvement.
Short of all the nations teaming up in the community and advocating for one anothers mbts… idk, gaijin gets away with this constantly because everyone is divided. So we only ever cry about our preferred nation and then either stay quiet or discredit one another when it’s another nations turn.
In my discussion, you can see that I touch upon what has been said regarding this topic.
Gaijin and devs just hate germans and the reason is something beyond the game
Not even that, it really is mostly the Leopard 2 they mess up every time.
Honestly its just a leopard 2a7a1 thats what im gonna call it instead of the leopard 2a8. Itll all be fine i think they shouldve added the 2a7a1 before the 2a8 anyways.
It’s 2a8, man, but 2a7a1 doesn’t make sense.
2a7a1 had the option to have trophy mounted did it not. Makes sense since we are getting a leopard with trophy. If it isnt quite up to par with how the 2a8 should be then why not call it a 2a7a1?
What, are you level 2a8?? Strw 123a is level 2a8 for you?
Or strw 123b?
Im mainly referring to the armor of the 2a8 if it wont get it and this 2a8 we are getting is just gonna be a 2a7v with troohy whats the harm in just calling it a 2a7a1
Because that’s what the manufacturer called it. The 2a7a1 is a prototype, nothing more. The 2a8 is a finished tank, and we don’t know the exact configuration for Germany, only the Norwegian one.
The 2A7A1 had its roll out just like the 2A8, its not a prototype.
2a7a1 is not a prototype it is a production interim tank. Otherwise bring facts to the table.
I won’t say 100% that it’s a prototype, but in my opinion it’s a technology demonstrator and not a production tank. You can’t say that th EMBT 2022 is a tank.
As an example, what’s the difference between a technology demonstrator and a prototype? In my opinion, there’s no difference.
Which remains factually incorrect, no matter how you spin it. Its a production vehicle, not a prototype, demonstrator or what ever you want to call it.