Napkin math strikes again (unfortunately)…
I wonder then if the CAMM/ASRAAM is missing a load of thrust
i have no idea, gotta ask Flame
Note ASRAAM and CAMM are different weights, 89kg CW 99kg.
ASRAAM has a longer burn time too
Yes, ASRAAM will accelerate even more
Honestly not sure what to make of the burn time. Could be 3 seconds of pure boost, or could have a couple of extra seconds at a reduced thrust.
1 Like
It probably variable no? Depending on conditions?
73 for example is boost only for 4.2 to 6.8 seconds
Really depends on the altitude and temperature too. So tbh I don’t think the current burn is particularly bad as a general representation.
wait so (assuming the databuses are the same) you can put an ASRAAM seeker on a SL launched CAMM and an RF seeker on an ASRAAM?
They nerfed the damage of missiles? I’m getting “hits” more than never in this update, the first two i was in doubt because the launch wasnt very optimal, but this last one leaves no doubt, it was a very good launch and scored only a hit
Yeah all missiles are like that
Sarh and ir to have the same issue
Ir is a bit more consistent
1 Like