Nice video !
Definitly feel like the Asraam is a mach3+ missile.
Look like the Asraam migth be a 70G missile after all (so it does uses dual plane). Feel like the 100G value is still too high tho.
It’s still probably one of the least maneuveuring 5gen missiles.
Since it doesn’t have a thrust profile optimised for HOBS shots.
What do you mean it’s not optimised at high off bore sight? It can literally launch at aircraft directly behind
I meant that the thrust is not optimised, not the seeker. I know it can engage target behind. But its thrust is a very high boost speed straigh off the rail.
The Python 5/Iris-T have low thrust at the start so they are able to turn more effectively at low speed.
So the turn radius and the 180* Time is worse than other 5gen missile (probably around 4sec) but it’s still able to do them.
Added the missile! 👍
^^
You don’t have a picture for the Piranha.
I’ve made a google sheets for all the values of the missile in the thread.
If you want to make direct comparaison between missile then it’s easier that way.
I’ll add the FOX 3 missile from the other thread in the futur.
I added a new turkish missile: the Bozdoğan.
Unfortunatly since it’s very new (only started production this year) there’s really not a lot of information on it.
If you got any sources giving more characteristics then please respond to this comment so i can upgrade my thread on the only turkish FOX 2 missile!
*Only asking for OPEN SOURCE information :)
Does everyone know if the RB-74M really existed?
I know the RB-74 is just the swedish designation of the AIM-9L (and it went into service extensively)
But the RB-24M (swedish designation of the AIM-9M), never saw anything about it or even mentionning it.
Is it a real export AIM-9M that sweden bough or just a balancing thing that Gaijin has done because the Gripen with 6 AIM-9L would be DOA?
This is a Balance-somewhere at the exhibition there was an RB-74 rocket with improved data…they conditionally gave it the name RB-74M…
I found a document saying that americans refused selling them the Mike model so they asked the Germans for the Li version, for the sake of sweden’s balance I hope that purchase happened.
RB-74(M) is not related to AIM-9M, they wrote M to show that it’s “Modernized” RB-74
now this is a copy of aim-9m
The best thing to do is to make a report and either remove it and replace it with aim-9m, or change it to the real version.
Amazing work!
What are your sources for the 9M seeker blocks?
I think it is a balancing decision by Gaijin. The closest I have gotten to evidence of a Swedish 9M was that it had been brought in for limited compatibility testing.
Although the Hungarian variant uses the 9M which should suffice for verification of utilization.
No, developers have said that RB 74 (M) is a modernization. M is the modernization, not the AIM-9M.
It is assumed to be a Swedish upgraded AIM-9L/I-1.
Do you know if it will be copy paste of AIM-9M on live server, or if it will be differentiated from AIM-9M?
Will this missile get the smokey motor of the 9L?
Thank you for this, do you think the de-chirped 9Li will have much different performance to the 9M?
(Do you know what model 9M Gaijin is trying to represent in game?)
As far as I am aware. All dechirped missiles have been hard denied
