Sure but thats Gaijins workaround for not including LOAL on any weapons
Tested so its not fake as per Gaijins rules
No idea tbh
There are for sure some obscure ones that might be questionable depending on the source material but none in the same blatantly sourceless or unrealistic realm as the stuff russia gets in top tier these days.
How many of them breaking the game? Really I am looking for answer here.
hmmm
LDIRCM
of which NATO has…
3
(Keep in mind the Mi-28NM’s one is the worse one out of them all with actual blindspots)
JSOW is literally ignored by AI anti-air
GBU-53 on F-15
You also have other unbalanced NATO things like MICA seeker which is magically better than every other modern Fox-3 seeker while all the others are the same for some reason
There’s also stuff like 12.0 abrams which outperforms many 12.7 MBTs yet is still 12.0
Then there’s M829A3 and M829A2 as stock round for 12.7 abrams which, weren’t needed at all
Ohhh, I forgot the big one
35mm Oerlikon style APHE
People have talked about this since they got released but gaijin still didnt fix
which 12.0 abrams because from my experience playing M1A1s on 12.0 I get lolpenned and constantly explode from front fuel tanks while russian tanks eat rounds with side era, basket/autoloader or the fuel tank itself
All of them
They’re literally just the M1A2 SEP without M829A3 and gen 1 thermals
Not longer range than the SPAA available.
Lock range of Kh-38s is 15km until LOAL is added, then it gets nerfed to 1.5km.
And how do you know this is a guarantee
Cause Gaijin adds correct seekers when the technology is in the game to support them.
The reason MTs are not 1.5km now is cause LOAL isn’t a feature in-game, so they use the AGM-65D seeker instead.
Do you have the proof for this
Because I want a guarantee that this is the case from gaijin for the Kh-38
Not a statement from a random on the forums
People would have to prove Gaijin will change their behavior.
They’ve already made statements on bug reports & elsewhere about seeker heads.
It’s why Magic 2’s IRCCM was added with IRCCM missiles.
& why AAM3’s IRCCM will change when new generation IR missiles are added.
a lot of missile IRCCM would change
bro they can fire it from the airfield where AA cant even lock them, not to mention maps where the airfield isnt even in LOS from the AA and they can lob missiles over mountains
IR seekers require line of sight to launch.
Only weapons without IR seekers can launch on GNSS waypoints.
bro did you sleep for the last years in WT? KH38MT has IR+IOG+GNSS
Even penguin on F5A that is only IR+IOG can be fired via locking a point on the map and without IR lock.
IR seekers [at least from helicopters & in-game AGM-65 derived] lock missiles from being able to be fired outside of LOS.
GNSS does not override the IR seeker in War Thunder.
Penguin is not use an AGM-65D seeker in-game, it is entirely different from the AGM-65D/G, IR Hammer, & Kh-38MT seeker heads [which are all the same in-game at this time].
This sounds like you’re saying “trust me bro”
So just like every nation with GPS guided munition.
even if the IR seeker is currently bugged it does have GNSS and you can switch to the ML version to spam from airfield
does any other nation get a pantsir with 90+ missiles and can fire 6 AGMs that have a 100kg warhead and fly with the speed of an AAM every what, 40 seconds?