yeah unplayable when russia has like 53% winrate and US has 45%
pretty big difference dont u think?
there were times they had ~60% this year
I think you looking at wrong stats.
Line of sight is required unless they’re using Laser-GNSS weapons.
Check Ground Sim Battles win rate, its a CAS festival.
Ground RB in compare
If in realistic battles USSR dropped and US went up, its most likely because of the team mixing. When the teams are permanent, you see the true face. (Ofc talking about CAS, in sim you can first spawn CAS and thats why USRR always wins, in realistic battles maybe because of the new Abrams, soviet teams ahd it harder to get score to spawn CAS)
1 Like
I have no idea what website you’re using
But this is statshark, which is probably the most relevant stat checking site
Why are the winrates like this?
Well, it’s simple
Pantsir SM-SV
Yeah I didnt know how to hide the other BRs. So I used ThunderSkill.
You can absolutely fire off KH-38’s on most maps before the enemy can fire any form of missile at you, not to mention in ground rb dodging fox 3’s is easier than stealing candy from a baby.
please dont use thunderskill
its dataset is too small because it has a very limited sample size, so doesnt give accurate statistics
1 Like
Yeah, don’t use that site
Any data there is hilariously inaccurate due to sample sizes
Statshark takes all player’s data
Thunderskill only takes those who use it
1 Like
For simulator they literally have single digits sample sizes, it wouldnt be a surprise that they are tracking a single dude on these
I would argue that it is the combination of SM-SV and first spawn MI28NM with LMURs (with an Su-30SM2 or two to push back any CAS that survives the pantsirs)
if it wasn’t for SM-SV it would be more equal
NATO’s lack of powerful SACLOS AA also causes this
It’s not really the CAS munitions but first-spawn CAS is pure bullshit
People shouldn’t use skill sites when discussing vehicles regardless.
Reducing variables to as little as possible is needed.
It’s why we can say Kh-38MT & Hammer with their AGM-65D/G placeholder seekers are superior to AGM-65D/Gs themselves in a vacuum.
& why against MBTs “protected” by VT-1 missiles, initial year Pantsir, etc were not effective at destroying the aircraft using any of those weapons making the air to ground weapons’ carriers annoying to deal with.
F-15Es, Su-34s, & Rafales had to be dealt with using other aircraft the vast majority of the time.
SPAA forced these aircraft high until the new SPAA was added in 2025 to force them low again.
Sometimes yes
It’s good to see how vehicles are performing so we can see why gaijin makes the balance changes they do
and guess what russia has that is fast af has long range on every top tier CAS plane?
Kh-38MT is not even real and LMUR should be 4 per heli but you know gaijin loves fake russian things.
Gaijin loves to fake even non-Russian things but you go girl
but there is a single manufacturer document and a photo from 15 years ago of a wooden prototype!!! must be real because russia wouldnt lie!
But rarely to the benefit of said thing.
SPICE 250 seeker iirc can actually only lock targets at 2km range
Rafale with extra missiles
JAGM IR seeker is also overperforming vs IRL iirc
Somua or AMX’s ufp is also stronger than irl (can’t remember which)
There’s many more examples but I honestly cbf to find them all
1 Like