no it wouldnt, whatever the best APS tank is now would still be better against aerial threats, and the 2A7/Strv 122 would still be better on tank-tank combat
The only DU ammo in-game currently is M829 series, and M900.
All the others are on tungsten currently, and a spall overhaul is something I’ve supported.
1 Like
L27 is DU though no?
and is the increased post pen/incindiery spall modeled on M829?
Its the uncounterable air to ground missiles from CAS which are the main strife of top tier and such an APS remedies this greatly. even though BN has less tank on tank protection its overall better as the KA50 that’s 10km away cant kill me
It should be DU, i believe L26a1 was also a DU dart
Dunno about spall cause I don’t pay attention to spalling due to me entirely eliminating it from my playstyle in 2020.
L27A1 is tungsten though last I checked.
I know of the DU OFL round for France, but it’s currently not in-game.
Obvious 3BM59 isn’t in-game currently.
so CR2 BN would still be more effective against airborne threats, and even catch some rods, and ofc 2a7 is still better in tank-tank so SEPv2 wouldnt be the best
literally says its DU, and explicitiy states the secondary incinidiary effect
2 Likes
The max BR for ground before the A7 was added was 11.7 the max br up until 4th quarter laster year was 11.7. So no it did not cause the BR to rise.
I don’t know if you are miss remembering or if your being disingenuous and lying. I like to imagine it’s the former but you missrepresenting one of my statements has me questioning it.
Like it only working once didn’t give them a huge advantage everyone moaned about how
powerful the Spall liners made them.
oh yeah, and M919
1 Like
@HOMINUSNOCTURNO
Didn’t know F-16C, F-15E, Rafale, etc were just all Su-34. /s
Not sure why you’re shilling for Soviets and insulting Americans when you could just ask sincere questions and learn something.
Bro gtfo the same lame ass responses. Come back when you have something intelligent to actual add
ts pmo sm bro, you gotta stop trolling.
@French_Cat2
So criticizing War Thunder, and calling CAS OP means people are trolls…
Keep defending Gaijin and CAS instead of conversing on-topic.
CAS is OP, War Thunder needs SPAA for all 10 tech trees.
1 Like
Nah bro your literally just a russ1an bootlicking bot like the Devs lol
and thats a bann for insulting the devs just saying xD
@HOMINUSNOCTURNO
Weird how your posts are defending Russia while mine criticize Russian equipment; and my posts are defending Abrams from attacks.
Not only that but I’m American with NATO biases, everyone knows this.
Your online persona is looking anti-America, which you may intend or not. I hope it’s not your intent.
And on top of all that your post implies that NATO is Russia.
Soviet equipment is correctly eh in War Thunder just as it is IRL.
The fact it took Su-34 for Soviets to get something on-par with F-16C for ground battles is hilarious, and even then CAS is too much spawn points to warrant a spawn.
I only spawn tanks and the odd anti-CAS jet.
I mean its obviously and painfully true considering the state of the game lol they ignore half the reports pertaining to Russian vehicles and just keep them op and super unrealistic.