Why M1A2 SEP V2 Don't Have Trophy System And LWS in game

pretty sure it does have LWS, not exactly sure since I don’t have it though

It doesn’t. In game I don’t think any American vehicles have an LWS. Which is accurate, the U.S. didn’t really use many vehicles equipped with an LWS.

might have been thinking of something else then IDK

btw the MH-60, OH-58, AH-6, AH-64 (I think), AH-1z, all have LWS only one I’m not sure about is the ah-64

If that was the case we wouldn’t have gotten the 2A7s and 122B+ lmao.

the SEPv3 without trophy is already a 2A7V counterpart

1 Like

Anything above 12.0 is produced by aircraft. So when talking about ground lineups it is better to use the tanks highest BR which is 12.0.

Also once again multiple people have said this I have said this. The SEPv2 didn’t add anything to the lineup besides something that looks cool. You are better off taking 1-4 of the 4 11.7 abrams in the lineup. So stop with this farce about single vehicle lineups at top tier.

It’s also already been mentioned the SEPv3 is in reality the 2A7V counterpart yet the SEPv2 was added with it.

1 Like

As an aside there are also the L/55 or XM360 demonstrator(s);

Also as referenced in the thread the M1 thumper uses an upscaled M256 to 140mm w/ a L/56 guntube; the XM291.

a concept? so a paper vehicle like the R2Y2 that are getting removed soon.
If it never was actualy built there is no place for it

Except it was actually built.

2034536879

1 Like

thats the 140mm, very nice of you yes.

So please now show me the 120mm abrams that uses the L/55 whose suggestion he posted and which i am referencing

ok

1 Like

ok seems like it wasnt posted as part of the main suggestion itself fair enough

image
image

1 Like

It was I think it is like a few post down from the original.

What drugs are you on?

Well, for the M1 with M256E1, I believe the stabilizer didn’t work very will with the gun, so it wouldn’t work well at top tier. As for the Thumper, I would be all for it.

Actually that Thumper is 120 mm. That picture of sitting Thumper with 140 mm is wrong, as ATAC is both 120 mm and 140 mm

We can distinguish 120 mm version and 140 mm version of ATAC by the barrel rear the fume extractor. 120 mm version has rear barrel thicker than fume extractor, which is clearly shown in picture of Thumper
E6TFG4L

Meanwhile 140 mm version of ATAC has fume extractor that is similar or thicker than rear barrel
(this picture if mockup Thumper of 140 mm version)

I cannot even spot these objects on Abrams SepV2, like, anywhere

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

how tf stryker belongs to this discussion?

i said the APS slots were modeled on the strykers in game model, and you asked?