Imagine making a thread to peddle some spaghetti of “Chinese favouritism” and of all Chinese vehicles you pick the QN506…
5,60 seconds for the QN506 and 4,22 seconds for the Jaguar w/cage armor.
The difference is SURPRISINGLY way less significant. What about the QN506 vs the other fat IFVs ? :)
I already know the answer. You can clearly see midfight, off-road, they basically have the same speed, and maybe some fat NATO IFVs are even slower.
And here comes another SadRIPer goalpost moving.
“The QN506 is more mobile than the wheeled NATO IFVs”
“No no that mobility stat doesn’t matter, only this mobility stat matters” (which has no backing and is liekly made up by you)
“Oh the ~25% acceleration difference is insignificant, they are basically the same”
Are you really still suprised why people don’t take you serious?
1 Like
“No no that mobility stat doesn’t matter, only this mobility stat matters” (which has no backing and is liekly made up by you)
You have to distinguish the time the vehicle reaches around top speed (basically how much time it needs to reach 30-60) and the “midfight” acceleration time to reach 0-30.
The top speed is usefull to position yourself, so let’s say the QN506 is not good at positionning itself early game (on the contrary of NATO IFVs, which reach top speed faster).
But midfight, and in this case off-road, NATO IFVs and the QN506 both have +/- the same acceleration. So midfight, they perform de same in terms of mobility. And pretty sure midfight, the QN506 is faster than Pumas or Namers.
It is not a “goalpost moving” to say that, it’s just the truth
“Oh the ~25% acceleration difference is insignificant, they are basically the same”
25% seems high in terms of %, but in absolute value, we’re only talking about 1.38 seconds. Midfight, it’s nothing
2 Likes
They are very useful to one tap light tanks and spaas without making obvius to the rest of the enemy team where you are.
They are also lethal to MBTs but you need aim. Not to mention that in close ranges you can spam them like if they are hydras lol.
1 Like
Leopard 2A4, 2K?
Are you realistically going to hit those shots without the MBT blowing you to pieces first?
Because you do not how to play it, like most of the players. Also its faster at tracking than .50 cal.
1 Like
Dude, this is a pure gimmick.
This is loner we’re talking about lmfao
That can be said about all IFV with atgms, sabots being faster than any missile. And its bc this vehicles are not made for face to face engagements, but as flankings or camping.
But even if you face it frontally, just guide it at the cannon.
1 Like
Doesnt mean the grenade launcher its useless, it just requires effort, which none here even tries to do.
Me neither zzz.
1 Like
Never said it wasn’t useless.
It’s just not a real advantage to have.
Now this is just absolute nonsense, the QN506 has an identical engine to a T54 (and actually worse transmission) but it is 6 tons lighter.
1 Like
It doesn’t prove sh*t
If they both accelerate as fast midfight during the first 0-30, top speed of Puma being > than top speed of QN506 isn’t relevant
Plus, I literally wrote 556 other things about why the QN shouldn’t be 10.0 while the other IFVs are 10.7/11.0/11.3, and people here still focus on the mobility lmao.
See that post Why is the QN506 10.0? - #37 by gfdsa_killer up there ?
You don’t even know what you’re talking about, you talk without knowing. It can pen any side armor even the Leo 2’s, and as shown it can even pen front MBTs if well aimed lol
They can overpressure as well, take out helicopters far away, … they’re useful
Never said it wasn’t useless.
It’s just not a real advantage to have.
It is, you just refuse to use it
With the number of advantages russian stuff has, they should all be 12.7, if I want to caricature things
Man compare it to NATO stuff
The only relevant vehicle here is the CM34. If we consider it as fast as other NATO light tanks, the QN is practically as fast as a light tank
Especially midfight, which represents the path until the second hill I’d say (0-30), they’re basically as fast. So midfight, the QN’s mobility is not a minus
Your BS stipulations make no difference because the speed advantage plays out the most in the opening stages of the game when advancing to positions, where the QN506 fails miserably because it’s barely faster than a T-54 while being tiered above MBT-70s, while being armed with a pop gun and foam rockets.
And on no planet does a difference of 8 in HP/t magically result in “mid fight” acceleration being better, there’s less of a difference between the Chieftain Mk 5 and Leopard A1A1.
if the QN506 is so good, then go play it bro
100 semi-useful rounds (worse APFSDS than the soviet one)
If they even hit
Not to mention that the IR AGM are bugged and won’t fire half the time