The Panzerhaubitze 2000 sits at 7.7 while having a reload of 6.0 seconds which is just inaccurate and straight up annoying since PzH 2000 has to fight vehicles like early MBTs (T-55, M47s) while the Bkan 1C fights late WW2 type of vehicles (Tiger II H, M4 sherman) and has a reload of 3.2 seconds. Gaijin please either turn the reload of Panzerhaubitze 2000 to 3.0 seconds or set PzH2000 to 7.0 aswell. WHO STANDS WITH ME?
Panzerhaubitze 2000 has 5.0 sec reload and after 7.5.
PLZ05 has 7.5 sec reload at same BR
So…
2 Likes
7.0 for Tank destroyer with Laser rangefinder and 5.0 reload, are you crazy?
3 Likes
One has LRF which is a big deal for SPHs.
Im talking about the inaccuracy since irl PzH2000 has a reload time of 3.0 seconds while PZL05 irl has 7.5, ask china why they tried copying PzH2000 yet still failed that bad
I said OR not DO IT. if PzH 2000 doesnt get its irl reload then ig it deserves to have laser rangefinder at 7.0
nah nah dont change the subject
As far as I know, even if it had a 3-second reload, but this is one of the firing modes after which you need time to cool down. Do you want a couple of shots with a 3-second reload and 1 minute of waiting for the barrel to cool down?
why doesnt Bkan 1C have to cooldown?
Well, the big differences between them, is that Pzh2000 has an LRF and fully traversable turret. Meanwhile Bkan has no LRF - and barely any traverse whatsoever. Pzh is also like twice as fast.
Though, with that said, Pzh2000 is still a half baked mess. It should have L15A2 (A round already in game fired from the same gun on the Type-99 at a lower BR). It should have spall liners, it still needs it’s armour holes fixing, and tbh, it’s always going to feel worse than other SPH’s because it’s one of the only ones to have its FCS components modelled. Every hit is crippling, in ways it necessarily isn’t for most other SPH’s.
Ask sweden why no cool down for bkan
1 Like
The Bkan is as fast as a snail and lacks a proper traversable turret. It also has quite a small ammunition count. That’s why it’s at 6.7.
1 Like
Because Swedish manufacturers > Bundeswehr ?
1 Like
The Bkan lacks a proper turret, LRF, and it’s less survivable, and less mobile. It also has a much lower ammo count, but the new ammo crates make it better.
We also don’t need any more newer howitzers at lower BRs.
1 Like