I played Sweden, wasn’t that impressed, although I did win a few thousand Euros in non-Gaijin sponsored tournaments with Sweden.
‘City’ Belfast is irish, but ‘Cruiser’ Belfast was always, and even now, British ship. Never been in Irish service. Enough nonsense please.
That’s just an awful idea, why should unrelated vehicles be in Israel?
But honestly what makes you think Gaijin would implement South Korea in Japan? Especially when sub trees are placed based on the connection they have with the country they are in
I said both northern and southern Korea. I’m including Korea and the American occupied southern half.
Non of them have anything to do with Japan, so again what makes you assume that Gaijin would implement them in Japan?
hell no
South Korea should be a tree like Israel or a combined tree with North Korea(as their relationship improve a bit recently)
No mames XDDDDD
Unfortunately that’s how I think it will be. Get to Rank IV America, China, or Japan to unlock the Korean Tech Tree.
You are either a troll, or extremely ignorant. Seems to be the former.
To anyone reading this thread. Please mark inappropriate and hateful messages for review by forum moderators. You can do this by clicking on the three dots icon under the offending message, then clicking the flag icon which appears. In the following interface, select the category describing the offending message, and click on “Flag Post”.
In order to make trolling less effective, please ignore any messages sent by trolls, and do not respond to them in any way, even if you intend to argue with them. Thank you for doing your part against trolls.
Korea doesn’t give shit. but TH was a mistake. it would literally be better if they just add the entire ASEAN to japan and shove in SU-30MKM, F-16A MLU, Hawk 200, A-4, MiG-29N, Bronco, and Hunter FGA 74. Add in Leo 2SG, Leo 2ID, PT-91, Pandur, Scorpion, Saracen, and Bionix to the ground tree.
If they want Enrichment from SEA, they should add all of them.
I think maybe at least one more country would be added, as now it is not rare for see multiple sub-tree.
I think Indonesia as best choice as it is another nation that can give variety of vehicles all among ground/air/heli/bluewater/coastal.
Indonesian naval coastal might be good, but most of them are missile frigate. if we want something from Indonesian army inventory, it’s gotta be air. We got Avon sabre, MiG-17-21, TU-16, IL-28, A-4, F-16, Flanker (27 and 30), and Super Tucano for low tier CAS.
With rafale F4 already on production and talk for F-15EX and rumour J-10, japan air can be the strongest air tree in the game esp with SG added.
I would suggest an ASEAN sub tree and give Japan the necessary vehicles they need but this should be countries they have an military connection with.
If that’s the case then Japan isn’t getting any subtree at all. sorry but you gotta shoehorn some BS in if you want japan rank 5 - 8 to have some content in it. and seeing as they can shoehorn Israel, a tree where third of it composed of M-60 as a standalone tech tree instead of trinkets spread across all tree, shoving in ASEAN to JP is really not that big deal of an issue.
There’s no problem with that. Let it stay as it is; let them have their domestic vehicles. Israel tree doesn’t even start at low tier, why should Japan TT get favourable treatment?
Also, Singapore belongs either in Israel (military ties, more urgent need for vehicles) or China (culture and influence) TT . Japan is almost completely unrelated.
For coastal, I’m more concentrated on patrol boats and corvettes less than 1,000 ton, which Japan clearly lacks behind. Thailand and Indonesia both have quite candidate for this.
For air, yes as a Japanese naval player, I do have a hope of using Indonesian iL-28 or A-4, as all those options for now lacks ‘big bomb’ over 1 ton.
And for ground, you also have to include Indonesian AH-64E apache too.
Their relationship in real life should have very little effect on how they are grouped in game. A Korean tech tree containing north and south would be awesome and very diverse even if the low tiers are copy pastes.
its almost like when you buy 1 new plane every 2 decades you start to run out of content for the tech tree
yeah i mean it make sense
just need someone to make suggestion for NK sub tree
I wouldn’t mind that, allowing Japan to have more diversity than light tanks and generic American planes. Then again, you’ll have some crybabies saying Japan shouldn’t have Russian equipment.