welp
Well, what are you saying, that it should because itβs just a game? or that it wonβt because itβs not going to be triggered in the method that it needs to specifically cause the reaction?
it would be funny, imagine just seeing the nuke go off in the distance and nothing happening
This isnβt COD as the OP has pointed out that is their basis for thinking that it should explode.
ohs
welp ig ignore what i said then I misunderstood
To be truthful, the detonation of nukes is something to be intrigued in.
From the US trying to get the Russian sub from the pacific, and the nuke slipping out of the tube, to the time that the US dropped a few nukes into the Mediterranean, along with the various testing that was done at the Marshall Islands and Bikini Atoll, itβs quite a remarkable thing that Ernest Rutherford brought forward.
Ooooo
Oh boo-hoo, your Nuke win got denied by a competent enemy.
It absolutely should be able to be destroyed by being shot out, just like every other suspended armament in the game. Donβt like that? Too bad, so sad. Pick a better approach vector next time.
Cute flag
So, would the main question be how strong should a nuke be? Like what caliber and how many hits should it take to destroy a nuke?
Indeed it would.
Even further to this, are bomb bay doors modeled in armor, what effect would they have over the other bomb shots that are happening.