Why is Gaijin being so stubborn about their bug reports? Mirage IIIS C.70

Dev Server "Leviathans" General Discussion - Dev Server
1

Today i made a bug report about the absence of the AIM-9P, AIM-9P-4 and AIM-9P-5 on the Mirage IIIS C.70 for the swiss subtree in germany. My bug report, had a manual in it from 1985 btw, where you can clearly see that the Mirage IIIS C.70 had some version of the AIM-9P under its pylons. And what do you know Gaijin chooses to ignore this and label my report as Not Enough Information. I might just be dumb but and have missed something but from what i can see it clearly has a AIM-9P under its wing

Take a look: Community Bug Reporting System

I know i only have one source but i have seen plenty other with only one source that have been accepted.

1 Like
2

i mean I feel gaijin knows that the mirage 3S has aim9P +p4+p5, but it would be a very sad plane at too high a BR if it got the p4 or p5, so really they are sparing you suffering of a higher BR, 10.3 is a great BR cause it wont have to fight mig23ML spam, so really you dont want it to get better missiles

1 Like
3

Note that a report (more than one actually…) about exactly that question has already been accepted earlier on.

[Dev] Mirage IIIS missing Flz Lwf LL 63/91 (AIM-9P-5) // Gaijin.net // Issues

[DEV] Mirage IIIS missing the Flz Lwf 63/80 // Gaijin.net // Issues

As with everything else, spamming reports probably doesn’t help, so always check first if an observed issue is already on the way…

1 Like
4

how are you so fast? its been 4 minuts

1 Like
5

Discussed a lot already.

My take: if Gaijin would have wanted an AIM-9E armed Mirage IIIS, they would/should have gone with the pre-upgrade / pre-KAWEST 85 variant, not the one with canards, RWR, CMS…

The modelled IIIS C.70 is undisputedly a post-KAWEST 85 modification, so should have 9P-3/-4/-5 and an accordingly fitting BR.

1 Like
6

Totally agree with you Circleati i dont think that it should get the p4 or p5 but the regular AIM-9P why not? the hunter has it a a lower BR the other mirages in the french tech tree have either the AIM-9J wich is just the same as the AIM9P or the Magic 1 so why cant the Mirage IIIS have it?

7

In short: there’s probably no aircraft I’m more passionate about than the Mirage, so I am very attentive of it’s current state, bug reports, information, discussions, etc, because I REALLY want them to get it right… ;-)

8

lol me too

9

Those are suggestions, not bugs

Also

Plastic Model manuals are not sources.

10

I agree the P is probably fair, but it depends on how the aim26 performs and if it would warrant a BR increase over the mirage 5BA, the mirage 3E is not in a great spot at 10.7 in my opinion and without a better engine the mirage 3S would be in a similar situation

11
12

Hi

Perhaps you forgot to include it, but the only source in the report was not a manual for the aircraft, but a manual for a 1/48 model kit:

image

Such sources are not valid materials for the game unfortunately.

4 Likes