The new Iranian F-14A might be able to go up to 12.7 not too sure though. It trades long range IR missiles and SAHRs for the F-90s so it might be a sidegrade.
More of a sidegrade than anything.
It would go up to 12.7 but the RWR can’t detect other F-14s so the F-14 keeps the F-14 balanced lol.
I personally don’t understand why something like the F-14A with Aim54’s, or the new variant with the Fakour is at12.3 while the F-16A is @ 12.7. If it’s the all aspect missiles, then I feel that it’s weird that something that can reach out and touch people @ 30+ km is “less of a threat” than a jet that still has to get up close and personal after dodging said ARH missiles, especially in a heavy BVR meta.
Perhaps I am missing something to justify it, but it makes no sense to me.
The F-16A also has a cracked FM. 2nd best in the game.
Well, now to be the noob…
What’s FM?
Flight model
Thanks, too many acronyms to keep track of these days :)
Because not only the F-16A is the best or second best dogfighter in the game after the Gripen, depending on who you ask, it has a much, much better RWR (and so better situational awareness) and a better radar.
Between 2 players of equal skill the F-16A should have no problem avoiding the sparrow/phoenix and get to the merge where it will clap the F-14A with either guns or all-aspect aim-9L.
No it hasn’t.
You dodge their AIM-54, then you counter as they don’t have any BVR missiles left.
speaking of IRIAF kit is too potent at 12.3, decent airframe and fakours can hit long range 50km shots, has extremely quick acceleration and is a fox 3 so it can guide itself, can also take 2 r27s for close up defense or trade them for 2 sedjil which while unreliable have managed to hit easy 25km shots if it doesnt lose lock, the mig29 is 0.4 higher and has 2 r27er which are still worse at anything past like 15km so i dont see why this plane should be lower than mig29 or f16a
Gaijin balances off of stats though. The F-14 has a shitty RWR. There’s usually like 12 F-14s on each side so they end up killing each other, meaning the win rate should hover around 50%. Good luck convincing Gaijin with that.
60 countermeasures (and hot as heck engines), so good luck flaring more than 2 missiles shot at rear aspect
Horrible RWR
Zero all aspect IR missiles, and the only ones it has are 20Gs while many contemporaries have 30G+ missiles.
(Also the R-27ER is better than the Sedjil man…)
I know you didn’t just say that that piece of garbage Sedjil is better than the R-27ER, the best SARH missile in the game by a long shot and king of BVR, at least until the Fakour. (still a much better missile overall because it can actually turn)
Sorry but just for that statement alone everyone should ignore anything you say about top tier.
And btw, the Mig-29 also has an all-aspect PD radar, all-aspect IR missiles that pulls much harder and an HMD.
No, Gaijin balances off cross-analysis with performance metrics as a secondary source.
Win rate is not going to be used by any analyst for balancing.
Good question, especially when Phoenixes are better than aim-120’s in their intended BVR mode. It can’t be defeated by notch+chaff if the maneuver is not performed immediately at launch. And i don’t mean that last-second maneuvers dont work. i mean half-time.
It just ignores it all. So yes it’s an actual BVR missile that gives fox 3’s a run for their money while being at the abhorrent br of 12.3
lol AIM-120s are superior to AIM-54s in every way.
AIM-54s are the confirmed easiest ARHs to defeat. We don’t know about F90 at this time.
never had a single aim 120 ignore a perfect notch+chaff. plenty of phoenixes tho
Skip to 54 seconds. All ARH can be notched and chaffed.
Never had an AIM-54 unintentionally hit me.