Why Germany have the worst leopard variants

You don’t know how to read.

image

The E only stands for it being delivered to spain nothing more

The 2a6ex is the predecesor of the HEL and E, greek and spanish leopards. which then later on further developed to the 2a7v

The 2a4m was a 2a4 that was canada requested kmw to upgrade. The 2a6ex and following 2a6hel/e were results of germanys own upgrade programm for the general leopards

watch him claim the book made together with one of the main leopard project leaders is not a valid source

1 Like

That comments not very necessary.
Dont need to be c**t about it.

However it does beg to question why the expo showed the Leopardo 2 as different then doesn’t it.

Might u mean the leo 2e turtle?

Spain did do their own upgraded later on themself.

The original 2e is german that being said

No i ask because when im at an expo and im told the tank is different due to being named Leopard 2E (for España) and having different specifications for the spanish army over the 2A6EX demo, I generally believe it.

that be the one.

I will leave the other response up for others who wish to read it and learn by example.

Also i wasn’t debating that just that hte spanish do have the 2E and it stands for España.

I genuinely would like to see the 2a6EX and such in game as well

The 2a6ex and 2e arent 1:1 the same 2a6ex still has gen 1 thermals. But it was the base for the 2e. Additionaly the 2a6ex just isnt widely known by those outside of the specific group.
So honestly the average spanish crewmembers just honestly might not know it

Could very well be this too!

That is also true cause while i knew about the 2A5 and PSO I have never heard of the 2A6EX.

Got to ask as well, arent there more modifications of the A5 missing from the game?

(and why arent the leopard A1A3 and A4 in game. ) !

Throw the pso vt and urb op into the mix.
Germany had a lot upgrade programms in development during that time

Less, the missing ones realy only are the tvm series, the german Strv122s

2a4 has a lot same as 2a6 and 2a7. 2a5 not. Since the 2a5 only was a small period and got quickly upgraded to 2a6

1 Like

The tvm should be a modification for the 2a5

1 Like

Yeah i can tell, christ man theres loads of em!.

leopardo 2E evolución Tortuga looks awesome as well

so they could easily be implemented then realistically.

Will they be, ofc not hence why the 2A7 armour isnt correct either. but ehre we are

Thats the upgraded 2e turtle i meaned yeah

Turtle tortoise similae enough.
2e with a cope cage

Eh not 1:1the same slightly different turret side armor

1 Like

E is just its national designation, KMW just calls it “Leopard 2A6”.

and having different specifications for the spanish army over the 2A6EX demo, I generally believe it.

The only differences are thermals, BMS, and communication devices, other than that, it is pretty much just a 2A6EX…

1 Like

Yeah the name i gaves just the spanish name for it , tortuga is turtle :D

so a completely impossible feat for Gaijin got you.

It kinda cool but looks weird at tthe same time xD im reading through their sort of pages of information on it

Leopardo 2E* apoligies missed the o in the leopardo 2E.

yeah Dotshini elaborated on it as well tbh, it does puzzle me why we have so many challanger 2s for example, or so many abrams yet missing they skirted around leopard 2s for so long.

If the tanks are better than the competition (depending if they even bother to implement them right then BRs should reflect it)

But genuinely interesting read that on the 2A6EX, mind if i save that information?

Yeah but suppose as well at an expo they don’t want to just say its a leopard 2a6EX maybe? cant rightly answer why they informed me otherwise.

Probably because it’s a descendant of a 2A6EX? So yes, they’re right in saying that’s it’s a Leopard 2E and not a 2A6EX, you’re wrong in saying that 2E isn’t a successor to the 2A6EX.

Correct. I was under the impression the 2E I was shown was more adapted from it due to the time difference of the writing of this and the expo last year.

apologies

I don’t think I understand, isn’t rate of fire the single most important stat you could have to deal with weak spots? If you mess up you can try again faster

3 Likes

He does not want to hear that american tanks have an advantage. trust me you dont want to go there with this one.

The abrams with a 5 second reload and the second highest penetrating top tier round isnt a bonus apparently

1 Like

both players are ready to fire in the average encounter, so if you shoot at the same time (or even first) and have a 4s reload you’re technically at a disadvantage against a russian tank because your shot has higher odds of bouncing. 4s, 3 or even 2 seconds is usually enough for someone to aim and shoot back, and their shot will definitely pen

and trash bird’s point about pen is moot since the pen advantage of the abrams isn’t enough to get past the UFP i.e. the weak spot size is the same

it’s a simple statistical truth