Thats the upgraded 2e turtle i meaned yeah
Turtle tortoise similae enough.
2e with a cope cage
Eh not 1:1the same slightly different turret side armor
Thats the upgraded 2e turtle i meaned yeah
Turtle tortoise similae enough.
2e with a cope cage
Eh not 1:1the same slightly different turret side armor
E is just its national designation, KMW just calls it “Leopard 2A6”.
and having different specifications for the spanish army over the 2A6EX demo, I generally believe it.
The only differences are thermals, BMS, and communication devices, other than that, it is pretty much just a 2A6EX…
Yeah the name i gaves just the spanish name for it , tortuga is turtle :D
so a completely impossible feat for Gaijin got you.
It kinda cool but looks weird at tthe same time xD im reading through their sort of pages of information on it
Leopardo 2E* apoligies missed the o in the leopardo 2E.
yeah Dotshini elaborated on it as well tbh, it does puzzle me why we have so many challanger 2s for example, or so many abrams yet missing they skirted around leopard 2s for so long.
If the tanks are better than the competition (depending if they even bother to implement them right then BRs should reflect it)
But genuinely interesting read that on the 2A6EX, mind if i save that information?
Yeah but suppose as well at an expo they don’t want to just say its a leopard 2a6EX maybe? cant rightly answer why they informed me otherwise.
Probably because it’s a descendant of a 2A6EX? So yes, they’re right in saying that’s it’s a Leopard 2E and not a 2A6EX, you’re wrong in saying that 2E isn’t a successor to the 2A6EX.
Correct. I was under the impression the 2E I was shown was more adapted from it due to the time difference of the writing of this and the expo last year.
apologies
I don’t think I understand, isn’t rate of fire the single most important stat you could have to deal with weak spots? If you mess up you can try again faster
He does not want to hear that american tanks have an advantage. trust me you dont want to go there with this one.
The abrams with a 5 second reload and the second highest penetrating top tier round isnt a bonus apparently
both players are ready to fire in the average encounter, so if you shoot at the same time (or even first) and have a 4s reload you’re technically at a disadvantage against a russian tank because your shot has higher odds of bouncing. 4s, 3 or even 2 seconds is usually enough for someone to aim and shoot back, and their shot will definitely pen
and trash bird’s point about pen is moot since the pen advantage of the abrams isn’t enough to get past the UFP i.e. the weak spot size is the same
it’s a simple statistical truth
Hell argue until you give up that abrams is the worst top tier out there.
did they update the front ammo rack on the dev server? its now encased in something it seems, but it is not saying anything if you hower on it
I hope it’s armor cage
the chally3 is just sad with its huge breech which allows sharpanel to destroy the turrent crew and lack of survivability (no chassis armor, insta death from shell burndowns) and its speed comparable to a top-tier maus.bad example, t-80 ue and um r better for ur point as examples
Skill issues
11.7 tank
With l55/dm 53 and spall liner
You fight against t80b t72 ok leopard 2a4 Abrams 105
Chally 3 doesn’t have a spall liner, like at all
That is not a spall liner
The hull has them so yes it has it on the Hull front
What he has highlighted there isnt a spall liner though, not to mention the fact the rest of the tank
the spall liner at the hull front which doesnt even extends its IRL length because it also should be on the LFP.
But thanks for sharing that you have never played it