Why gaijin nerfed this tank and ignored realism?

As we all know, War Thunder is a realistic game—or is it? In reality, the M60A1 AOS and subsequent variants used the M392A2 round; although it was a British shell, it was actively procured by the US Army. Yet, in our game, the M60A1 AOS lacks this round—even though the standard M60 has it. It is a proven fact that the M60A1 AOS possessed and utilized this round as its primary ammunition, but once again, it is missing from the game. But this shell is weaker in 60° degree, but M392A2 is still good analog of M728
Also some proofs:



1 Like

M728 is better, why is it nerfed by not having a worse round

1 Like

I don’t know about this ammunution in particular, but if it’s better the tank itself might go up, which results in effectively no changes, and AI isn’t a source

Этот снаряд намного лучше чем нынешний, нынешний снаряд пробивает 260мм, а тот которого нету в районе 350мм пробивает, тот снаряд которого нету на M60A1 AOS есть на обычном M60 который на 8.0

No, M728 is way worse. You can see difference between classic M60 shell and M60A1 AOS shell

I looked into it and M728 is just better, yes pen at 0° 0m is worse, but at 60° (most shots) M728 would be better, you could make it into a suggestion though for flat targets

Ok, i’ll do it

728 is far better, may look worse on paper but its performs better against angled armor by a significant margin

1 Like

What?

it will still be a good analogue

How? M392a2 is inferior to angles at a br where most tanks are angled armor

Bro, why not to add it? Why you don’t want it to be added? No, you want to play game without variety

Cause it was out of service in the 70’s iirc

M60 gets it
M60A1 gets it
M60A1 (AOS) does not get it

No, it was out of service in 80s

Ok, but it’s still inferior in use compared to 728. Only looks better stat wise. The AOS would be nerfed if it got m392a2 as that would make the 728 a modification

Yes it is worse, but why not to add it

Cause it’s not needed, nor does anyone want it. If you think it’s missing then bug report it.

No, i already saw 2 posts about this shell

‘:/

Sure about that? cause I’ve seen none other than yours.

Yes i sure, maybe u didn’t see them cause im using English forum and Russian forum