i was playing 10.7 and i couldnt do anything against an aim9p
why gaijin?
5 Likes
Also why ussr has super sonic carrier while nato has the jaguar that can berly hit 1000kmh
9 Likes
u got us bro su7 is way better than the jaguar
hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
6 Likes
Gaijin:“Russian bias doesnt exist”
5 Likes
Jagaur nuke carrier used to havel flares (it bases on jaguar A which have lot of flare)
guess who protest and called it unfair to the point gaijin have to remove from it?
15 Likes
bc there is not much attention given to them.
We have so many nuke carriers in game (esp for the US), with flares, so it is a doing the work part, which apparently isn’t as high of a priority than introducing other stuff
2 Likes
yeah, Generally War is designed to be unfair/asymetric, so Gaijin trying to make stuff fair/equal and especially symetric, is extremely hard and honestly imo the wrong approach
Hmm let me guess is it the strongest nation in the game that start with: russia, and end up in :hella broken bias?
2 Likes
And loving playing victim thinking they are the most suffering that right!!
1 Like
because you know, russian bias, its not like the F-105 couldnt carry nukes.
1 Like
When they’re literally the same speed on the deck.
And yes, Russian bias doesn’t exist. Anyone claiming it exists just portray a love for Russia in their posts.
The fact you call USA “Russia” is proof of my hypothesis.
4 Likes
Why the jaguar hasn’t been replaced by the Tornado or F-111 respectively and why the Su-7 hasn’t been replaced by the Su-24 is beyond me. Also need to be given some flares I think. Even if it’s a limited amount (like 20 each)
7 Likes
F-111 for US
Tornado for Europe (variants depend on nation they use)
SU-24 for Russia
JH-7 for China maybe?
some Kfir for Israel?
F-4E for Japan?
Viggen for Sweden?
Mirage 2000D for France?
1 Like
Something like that, yeah
1 Like
They clearly not bruh su7 can hit super sonic before he drops the bomb jaguar is far frorm that
U are rly this blind to russian bias?
the speed difference is crazy tho
its 800km/h difference over the span of like 15km it is unbalance
@noamax
Both are below mach 1 on the deck.
And both are trash to accelerate.
There is no speed difference, those speeds are at 12,000 meters high up which you would know if you read the statcard.
Top speed at altitude =/= acceleration.
Also noamax’s post fanboying over Russia is noted.
Dude’s post claiming NATO is blind and only Russia knows.
Tgats simply not true su7 is faster jaguar cant hit 1100kmh before the drop stop spreading misinformation
@noamax There it is. You claiming that facts are misinformation.
I even forgot to turn on fuel consumption with this heavier bomb load:
Red lines just above Jag’s speed.
They’re the same speed.
1 Like
Yes and how much time to get to this speed?
Now test the same with su7