Seriously. Why are we getting a T-90 Squadron Vehicle? Why not give Britain something from Canada or Australia? A dedicated commonwealth column in our Air And Ground would be great. Sure, South Africa is commonwealth, but people are sick of that especially when the more historically aligned countries that Britain created have their own fair share of options they could contribute.
Stop shovelling random Indian and South African crap at the British Tech Tree, Gaijin. There are far better options. You’ve still basically ignored almost every post-WW2 light tank Britain built, and now we’re basically getting told “well if you pay up or squadron-grind for months on end, we’ll finally consider giving you some variety”
Still amazed the British tree didn’t get the Australian Abrams. It’s a squadron vehicle, not tech tree. So it’s less oppressive than all the copy-paste Leopard 2’s we’re seeing. We might even be seeing a Dutch Leopard 2 in the French tree soon thanks to that new sub-tree.
It’s just annoying that Gaijin only consider South Africa and India as British sub-trees when there’s like a dozen Australian vehicles across ground, air, and naval. India only has 2 vehicles in the British tree one is a premium that was just removed and the other is a squadron vehicle, but that’s officially considered a sub-tree?
Similar story can be said about Canada. C2A1 was a reward vehicle, not a tech tree one. So it’s pretty rare. Then the Leopard 2A4M is a premium. So none of these vehicles are tech tree tanks. They’re not taking away from more British tech tree additions, what’s the problem?