T55 is a monster
It’s really the to55 that’s total bs. Aphe and a useless gimmick but we all know it should be 8.3
And they smacked the 14mm on the object 140 but the t62 is left naked? Smh
1 Like
Ur just wrong and that’s that
1 Like
that’s the tiran 4s, not the tiran 6…
How so?
Look at israel players no one take the tiran 6 over magach hydra or shot kal
Also tiran 4s has diffrent gun but same hull and engine
The Tiran 4Sh is actually not supposed to have the gun it does ingame lol, but yes it is like that ingame (bc gaijin). It’s supposed to be the same Sharir 105mm with M111 APFSDS as found on the Tiran 5Sh and Tiran 6Sh.
You think the t62 is bad? Try the chieftain
I’m really not agreeing.
T62 ammunition;
The only things the T62 have over the Chieftain is access to HEAT-FS, a better acceleration, and a slightly faster turret traverse. Everything else is in favour of the Chieftain.
There’s a reason why you don’t see many T62 being played, there are way better options at the BR.
2 Likes
Lool 2025 an im hearing someone trying to act like t62 is worse than chieftain mk3.
Chieftain has less penetration, armor and speed. Like the only thing the chieftain does better is dsmage and hulldown. Which is situational at best
1 Like
You never played anything soviet past rank 2…
Armor at these br without composite is not relevant, everything goes through it.
Chieftain is very similar in playstyle with the T62, both are to be used in support at range, and the Chieftain has every metric to do it better than the T62.
You’re only reacting emotionally.
6 Likes
They are close, one is a better sniper and one is a better brawler, which one is better depends on the map’s terrain pattern lol have you played the T-62?
2 Likes
Better sniper is arguable, it has a rangefinder but the ballistics on the l15 are worse than on 3bm4 it has also worse flat and angled penetration, although l15 is more reliabled amd shatters less. 90% of war thunder maps dont accomadate a sniper playstyle, the chieftain with its poor mobility is simply qorse than t62 in most cases, i have not personally played the t62, dont really need to either.
The l15 has a better flat penetration than the 3bm4 while having the same angled penetration.
Sure, the thing is that the t62 itself doesnt have a good mobility for its br either
They are overall pretty close, one trades the better mobility, hull protection and more ammo choices for better firepower, turret protection, gun depression and commander overide.
1 Like
Comparing the T-62 and the Chieftains is something of a race to the bottom. The Chieftain has a notional edge in some areas, it’s worse in others, but in the end they both suffer at the BR bracket.
Ultimately, tanks that borderline require a defensive, hulldown playstyle that relies on armor shouldn’t be at the same BR as tanks with LRFs that outsnipe them, and rounds that trivialize even their best armor.
and as usual, everything, every god damn problems in that game comes down to the BR compression lol.
They “decompressed” 7.0 area a couple years ago by just compressing the bracket over it even more.
But I feel that it’s not ever gonna change.
those tanks are undertiered, no way t55amd1 and t69s should be at the brs theyre at, israel shot’s are fine imo
most definetly does for the level of protection it has, the chieftain does not have better firepower, it has better damage but that is about it.
Shot with ERA, DM23 and LRF definitely isn’t fine at 8.7.
It has no protection against APDS, HEAT or darts.
1 Like
the protection of the t62 doesnt help it at all at these br, the chieftain’s turret at least gives protection to apds and some apfsds, again it still have bad mobility.
it does since it reloads faster.