Aim120s are faster how? R-77-1 is mach 4 capable
I wouldnt say anyone got what they wanted. The aim120c is dogshit
2 Likes
Well… at least F/A-18C no longer ‘stuck with AIM-120B as the title said’.
:'(
no correlation
not true
i use aim120b on it.
r-77-1 tracking behavior is terribad. Sure it has the same seeker but the missile aerodynamics and trajectory choices are god awful.
It must be hard being so full of it.
3 Likes
Huh?
why have the f18 extreme fm overbuff and the 30sm fm still overnerfed? :D
Not only are you verifiably wrong. Your pathetic attempts to moan about are not even good bait.
2 Likes
“Verifiably wrong” is when i say two true statements: like the grid fin design making the missile wobbly and bleed speed the moment it has to turn, and to quote what everyone told me that except the mica every other amraam-type missile has the same seeker head. I’m literally quoting things people like you told me hundreds of times and even showed statshark spreasheets of. Don’t be cynical.
“No you don’t understand!!!?!! The second best missile in the game is actually awful 😭😭😭”
- Retard747Cultist
2 Likes
it’s literally just a tad faster than the aim120 and it’s very easy to defeat, just like the aim120.
And it’s funny that it’s the people like you the ones flagging my comments, while you’re posting baseless ad hominems.
Please refer to your stats first before calling anyone a retard. Thank you.
Better range than the AIM-120
Better WVR maneuvering than the AIM-120.
Literally the only thing better than it is the MICA.
Why does some RB peasant think they are special?
Edit: LMAO I just realized I have nearly more experience in ARH slingers in 1 aircraft than you do in all ARH slingers combined… GTFO of here pud.
Better range than the AIM-120
Literally just notch. You can defeat it from 10km away if you start notching. The R27Er is literally harder to defeat than that thing. I defeat dozens of r77-1 every match.
Better WVR maneuvering than the AIM-120.
So? It will get chaffed as easily as an aim120 and, precisely because of this better maneuvering you can make it bleed more speed.
Literally the only thing better than it is the MICA.
R77-1 is marginally better than aim120, the MICA is leagues ahead of the r77.
Why does some RB peasant think they are special?
I’m just saying to check yourself before you wreck yourself. The theorem of the feisty chihuahua and the stoic rottweiler is true. That’s why it’s a theorem. Mediocre people tend to insult more.
77-1 is a bit short on range compared to the AIM-120, but it makes up for it with excellent maneuverability and a fast time-on-target at close to medium ranges. It’s a perfectly competitive missile :)
fast? it’s literally one second faster than aim120 in every scenario lmao.
Wrong. Better WVR means you can fire it off bore, in no avoidance ranges much easier, and with it’s better motor will have faster time to target than the 120, and it’s not bleeding speed when the motor is still burning. They are chaffing anything when they can’t even get into a notch in time.
Literally you don’t know diddly-squat.
Wrong
No. I just tend to say if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s probably a duck. And buddy you’re a malard.
You’re literally negative (and nearly 0.5KD) in every ARH slinger you own. Your opinion is worthless on the subject, pud.
Although the missile’s drag causes its speed to decrease more rapidly over distance, I understand it is quite fast initially
Wrong. Better WVR means you can fire it off bore, in no avoidance ranges much easier, and with it’s better motor will have faster time to target than the 120, and it’s not bleeding speed when the motor is still burning. They are chaffing anything when they can’t even get into a notch in time.
Literally you don’t know diddly-squat.
Launchign r77’s off bore below 6km of distance grants me better results than with r77-1s. If the motor is still burning they will overshoot the target and that’s what i mean by defeating them, they literally miss on their own. When the motor is off you can simply rate the missile and make it bleed more speed.
Wrong
Literally the same seeker head, just 1 second less of time travel, slight more pull but still misses point blank head ons where even an aim9e would strike.
No. I just tend to say if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s probably a duck. And buddy you’re a malard.
Does a mallard compare to a common house duck?
You’re literally negative (and nearly 0.5KD) in every ARH slinger you own. Your opinion is worthless on the subject, pud.
the su-27sm is the only good arh slinger I own, you can’t justify the f-18 since that plane is utter dogshit whether it is stock or spaded.
You’re literally 0.5kd on anything that requires a remote knowledge of dogfighting or has a non doppler radar. You’re even negative on tanks and planes considering you play ground RB where it’s easy as piss to frag on tunnelvisioned black spots. And about 1/4th of your air kills are AI attackers.
This is my card in comparison:
so not only I killed more people than you even if we have roughly the same time played as fighter, i also have higher KD’s than you, higher win rates and better frag per match.
The lion doesn’t concern itself with the rabid chihuahua. But the rabid chihuahua still bites the lion, further spreading the illness.