Thats a lot of words to not address the one question i have asked to which your answer was previously:
"Do your best buddy! "
Are you ignoring it was placed at 7.7 based on presumably some playtesting, and what characteristics it brought to the table?
Since you are arguing for “no playtesting based balance” That is the sort of balance you are asking for.
Since you are very clearly upset about current VIDAR placement im suprised you are advocating for every vehicle to be balanced the way it was when first added to the game.
Me: WT does indeed sort battles based on player skills.
You: There is a hard limit on player performance otherwise the M18 would be 7.3
The skills I referred to were, as previously made very clear, “the average skills of the team.”
I mean, technically you are correct that there’s a limit on the average skill of a team, but the source of the limit is “basic bell curves in biology” or “regression to the mean”, not anything Gaijin did.
Gaijin currently does not provide win rate data. You can not argue a vehicle is too strong because it wins too much because Gaijin does not provide that data, yet they justify BR placements through hidden data.
All players can do is judge based off of perceived performance and the reality of a vehicle’s performance, that being its statcard.
That is not any amount speculative though, because they told you how they use it, and IF TRUE, the data can literally only say one thing based on that. One possibility is by definition the exact opposite of “speculative”.
Unlike your wildly speculative system you want them to use.
I have already responded to the comment previously but you feel my comment did not address it thoroughly. If you do not wish a specific response then I don’t understand your complaint.
Describe ANY possible data, other than 47-53% win rates, that they could give you without calling themselves liars.
Still waiting. This should be a super easy thing to answer. You seem to think that it’s important they publish numbers, which means that there must be multiple possible things they COULD publish. So… name a different one. Any one. Any one at all.
Ok, so your actual position is that:
“A vehicle should be balanced based on a person looling at a vehicle and judging what it brings to the table. And also put lots of effort into it i guess”
And when a vehicle is balanced that way you will immediately complain given what ive seen in terms of your comments about the Vidar.
Well arguably Vidar had the benefit of at least seeing some amount of playtesting