At their br brackets yes I guess
1 Like
Just a shame those two aren’t in USSR TT, I’d love to eat some popcorn while reading those threads.
1 Like
That may also me my fault. I have a 4.16~ KDr in it
I would definitely bring the butter lmaooooo
Huh?
Happens when people sometimes bring Simulator stats into discussion.
Didnt notice I had sim battles filter on instead. Doesnt invalidate my argument about stats anyway.
It does.
How so?
Because stats will easily point out outliers in performance ?
Stats being a bad argument was an okay thing to say in TS era, not so much in SS.
Failed to do so in case of turm 3. Same goes for sim 10_2 and above vehicles where nato systematically sux while having better tanks
Simple explanation for everyone who doesn’t understand—maybe even some devs.
The BMPT is overpowered. It has a broken armor model. For example, the sides show around 250 mm of armor, yet even 400 mm+ penetration often does nothing. The same issue happens with other parts of the vehicle.
In real life, if a rocket or shell hits the vehicle and causes an internal explosion, it would destroy the entire tank. In this game, however, it behaves magically and survives.
The statistics also show it’s overpowered: it has around a 2.5 K/D ratio. Considering there are many low-skill players in that nation, this alone proves how overpowered it is.
To be added: (Edited) : There is plenty of bug reports, yet Managers of that section doesn’t think its a bug. If we continue this behavior. I mean You Devs if you continue. Sonner or latter there will be some actions taken.
4 Likes
How so ?
It shows that Turm III is easily the best medium tank at it’s BR.
I’m not talking about Simulator as that mode has vastly different mechanics than GRB.
You might want to re-read the title :P
This is satire right? what a joke 😂😂
Only saving grace of Russian teammates is they respawn like an endless horde of bots, which wins them games.
Yea but its a top tier.
Even in this shi;ty website it shows that title is false. But Cleary it show where is some problems.
Try playing Sweden at 8.0 or higher. You get 3x AGTM. Pvrbv 551Just swapped place with UDES just before you could research it having to start over, Finnish line does not exist yet, The Pbv501 does not exist and your facing a USSR/Russian “T-55AMD-1” That is impossible to kill. I had a game where I spent all rockets in the “U-SH 405” against “one” T55AMD-1 only to have all but two rockets get blocked cause there where another two TT55AMD-1 just behind the first one (field of view was covered by a building).
And when you jump up one vehicle to 9.3 with +1 rating, USSR get those ERA/NERA plates which makes your ATGM do nothing.
Also, when the ATGM do something, they always shoot straight through the russian tanks, no spalling/splitter just a clean laser beam right through doing mostly no or little damage.
I hate the T-55AMD-1 SOOO much. Russian bias with 100% damage resistance to half the swedish tree.
The higher rating for the ATGMs and the Ikv91 did not help.
Then they get the era/nera…
Your ATGMs die from russian heavy machineguns. You yourself have no secondary ammo.
Your vehicles are super slow and weak power in comparison.
Russian tanks get stabiliser and I don’t know if they have laser range-finder. But probably that too.
And you cant fire while moving and must stop but the latest russian light with ATGM… the BMPTs something can move and shoot its rockets.
Sweden has many HEAT based ammunition that cant deal damage to russian tanks.
And you get to play Stalingrad or some other CQC city map every time its you vs russia.
Its not that far from mediums on 8.3 hence why devs think its “equal” to other 8.3 meds. Just look at difference between is7 or t58 and t10m. Its colossal. Besides that we have 8.7 mediums which are obv worse than turm 3 but have better stats on statshark. Look at obj 140 and magach hydra. Do you really think they are better than turm 3?
For me, those stats only prove that german players at that brs are hopeless. They even managed to make kpz70 look equal or worse than t72a/m