what BR is this? as 4.0 gets blackholed up to the 4.7 british lineup which will kill everything easily
and as soon as BMPT spawns dry up the russia teams implode
13.0 according to op
Too bad nato teams often implode faster than bmpts
Only peoples framerates when Churchill Crocodile starts spamming some flame goodness
well yea it takes 6 nato tanks to kill the biasmobile
I’d just like to throw my two cents in here. Pretty much every American heavy has the same weak spots - driver’s hatch, lower front plate, MG port (with a few exceptions, T58, T32E1 just to name a few).
You know what that sounds an awful lot like? Russian high tier — LFP/driver hatch? These arguments go both ways.
If 6.7-7.3 US heavies are biased, then all T-72/T-80/T-90 are biased as well. Both have immense firepower and are very strong compared to tanks of their BR.
“just shoot the weak spot bro”
I will agree with you that the T-58 needs a nerf (specifically shells, realistically can’t go much higher in BR). The T32E1, however, sits at 7.7, where it is incredibly weak. All 6.7s suffer the same fate of being absurdly weak in an up tier and being absurdly strong in a down tier. The enemy here is not the tank, it’s the lack of decompression. The T34 Heavy has a very long reload which greatly reduces combat effectiveness. The notoriously strong T-29 sits at a higher BR (7.0). The only real difference I can think of is that Russian T-tanks are able to tank many shots in an up tier.
I have played the T-80EU in a test drive and was able to tank ~5 shots to the breech without any damage whatsoever in my first match, and only died when I was shot in the roof. Following matches followed suit.
Slightly off topic but worth noting :)
your take is extremely bad… like wow.
Top tier darts that guarantee pen on weakspots vs
APHE that will likely bounce… wow…
Also, no, the T58 doesn’t need a nerf. It needs to be put at 9.0 like the Obj.279. The T58 actually vastly out preforms the obj.279 but it’s at a balanced br then.
If you really want to go as far as to say the T32E1 is weak, you really need to replay the game. It’s weak vs HEAT but so is everyone else. Against all else it’s quite strong, and has by far the 2nd best USA heavy tank turret. Next to the M4A3E2.
T14 should be the same br as the KV1C from Germany.
T34/T29/T30 should all be 7.3 minimum to match the IS-3
T26E5 should be 7.0
And the T26E1 is actually well balanced.
Granted some German vehicles need br increases as well.
Reply here where it’s appropriate:
Lastly, the only correct thing you said was decompression needs to happen
Skill issue
I’m SHOCKED it’s only a 67% WR. Truthfully I expected to see 80%+
2 Likes
Turm III is proof of Russian and American bias??
1 Like
neither ruin the br bracket lol
4 Likes
Russian tanks are really bad. Especially when pixel accurate shooting is part of game. They always shoot the lfp. Th| rest of the tank doesn’t exist for game purposes. This is inherent game flaw that you can’t avoid.
I suggest dropping GRB altogether. Sim ground has parallax that SOMETIMES deviates the shot off of the LFP and the actual tank design works as intended. Still, laser rangefinder eliminates parallax so it’s not a solution.
Take this advice and play 10_2 ground sim games as Russia instead
mig 29 from germany is not to good at all if can tell to you
One way someone makes it obvious they cheating is by playing an spaa at start of match and shooting say 16 missiles or more without need of reloading I see it in tons of matches shooting drones outa sky at start and god help the guy who didnt notice and gets in any CAS thats not a top tier heli… But if you dont look for things not related to your immediate game actions its pretty easy to not notice or if you hate CAS and drone scouting your very unlikely to report it
I dont need a client replay when I watch a single spaa player launch 24 missiles in the same amount of seconds mate its more like THE COMPANY YOU work for needs a better way to handle the problem
Need I reference my old post? The penetration map on NATO vs Russian vehicles is vastly different at high tier. I even referenced my own experience too — how can you deny that?
“it doesn’t need a nerf, it needs a nerf” is one hell of an argument. Saying it also outperforms the obj.279 is also crazy. How about (and bear with me) they are both broken? A shell nerf would be adequate since at 9.0 you would be facing tanks that are faster, better armored, and with higher penetration stats than you (XM803 at the same BR). 9.0 is one hell of a take, because any tank with absurdly strong rounds will be able to pen at any BR. People have taken many tanks to much higher BRs and done better with them. We won’t ever get a nerf, though, because it’s a premium. Before the T58, there was the Turm 3, which was also known for being strong by firepower (not armor).
It’s at a BR where you either dominate downtiers or are useless in uptiers. It has an abhorrent reload for a 90mm, greatly reducing combat effectiveness. I prefer the regular T32 much more — much more deserving of the top 3 spot imo. The 75 jumbo is still a favorite of mine, though.
Also I’m quite enjoying the argument of “as long as you don’t use ammo that’s not uncommon at this BR.”
Can’t speak on this myself, since I don’t have it.
Ironic considering these are all much less armored than the IS-3. The IS-3 has one (!!!) weak spot frontally, that being the driver’s hatch. It is a much stronger tank, armor wise. I am aware of the long reload and poor gun depression. In a frontal encounter, the IS-3 will have a much easier time killing than being killed, considering the size of the weak spot. It sits at 7.3 because it would be nearly impenetrable to 6.0s if lower, unlike American heavies which have larger, easier to hit weak spots.
It probably shouldn’t be at the same BR as the regular pershing, that’s for sure. Granted, it has worse mobility. I don’t see it going to 7.0, to be honest. Treat it like the regular 75 Jumbo.
Funny how you plug your own post every time you bring it off topic yourself. If you brought it up here, it is now on-topic.
American heavies are strong at 6.7. The T58 is too strong and needs its shells nerfed. You’ve convinced me of nothing except that you still debate the exact same way in every other interaction we’ve had, and it’s quite annoying to deal with. I will not be replying to you further unless you can provide something of substance, respectfully.
To bring it back on topic, Russian top tier win rates are currently the highest out of the 3 major nations. By a lot. Russia’s top tier win rate is actually higher than America’s every BR, except for low tier. I’d be more than happy to show you “balance” at work in this reply here. This one was more aimed at the BMPT, but I do dive into other areas of “balance” in it as well.
1 Like
In your opinion.
Rage bait much?
If that’s all you got out of my message, then there are bigger concerns here.
1 Like
Or I don’t care to reply to nonsense.
Especially from a player whom predominantly plays USA, France, and Sweden, two of those nations are known to be power houses in WT.