M1A1 forwards is more long range than basically any Russian tank at its BR, good gun handling and good rounds, only thing holding them back except the AIM (which has worse round) and the SEP, SEPv2 are the bad thermals
Huh?
The SEP is the best tank in the US tech tree lol, the SEPv2 is the same but heavier and has more space to land HE shells on to overpressure
I think US got it worse bc they added imo the best tank premium to the US tree, more recognized tank (everyone knows what an M1A1 is) and was the first top tier premium tank added.
Sorry what I meant to say was bad thermals held all Abrams back long range except for the SEP, SEPv2, and AIM
Oh okay that makes sense
I think all the M1s are recognized about the same lol, Any variant would have been a popular buy. I think no abrams should have been released as a TT premium.
He doesnt.
The reason why we saw more Click-Bait and AIM players is that Us team mostly fights alone against other nations, as soon as other nations teams up with Usa situation changes rapidely.
Noticed something? When we had only 2 Leclerc on our team even SEP players left after one death cause they knew they just couldnt win against best nations, but as soon as we teamed up with better nations results changed rapidely.
Us player base doesnt suffer from massive ‘‘skill issue’’, they suffer from fighting against best nations combo while forced to use inaccurate Abrams.
T-80BVM isn’t even a top 10 tank anymore since the update that flooded the game with tanks as good as Strv 122.
It would not raise in BR, though SEP1 and 2 would likely be above it in decompression.
T-90M would obviously be above BVM as well since it’s superior.
Best nations?
Well the first match lacked at least half of the best tech trees, only having 2 of the good ones: Sweden and Germany, vs their equivalently good tech tree of USA.
Of course Click Bait owners typically lack extra tanks.
Sweden and Germany are already the best nations in Ground Rb, what are you even talking about?
Imagine calling Sweden and Germany just “Good”, especially Sweden…
how is this a bad strat? your whole counter argument is this doesnt help the team but I recall that dropping a nuke should in theory help the team
why would you knowingly use a strategy that a tank does not allow? sounds like a recipe for failure.
not a valid point. everyone’s idea of “fun” is subjective
The best are USA for volume of best ammo’d great tanks, Germany for armor of 1 tank with 2 other T-80BVM armored backups, Sweden with 3 T-90M armored Leopards with lesser rounds.
Then bringing up positions 5 - 7 there’s Italy, Soviets, and China. Italy tying with Soviets due to that Leopard 2A7HU. Funny what 1 better T-90M tank would do for a tech tree’s strength when Italy already has better CAS & CAP.
Which leaves Israel for 8.
With France & Japan as the “weakest” lineups.
Tell me you have no idea about Top tier without telling me you have no idea…
This happens because theres more click baits to put on one team.
Or because they realized playing with AIM/Click bait players is hopeless?
Don’t take Alvis seriously, hes a known troll
Buddy real problem comes from mm.
80 percent of the time Us fights alone, thats why we so many Aim/Click-Bait players.
Thats literally not how it works. Because so many players are playing AIMs or Click-Baits, the US has so many players they need to be put together, leaving no real room for other nations.
Thats just an excuse.
We know that if Gaijin wants they can limit the amount of Click-Bait players for every match.
They did this for tech tree vehicles when they performed to well, same principle can be applied to premium/squadron vehicles to.
But i guess limiting the amount of premium vehicles per match doesnt suit Gaijin’s marketing.
Ironnically, if we take Chally 2 and Russian T series to this argument:
- Chally 2 can’t ultilize speed and acceleration to reach destination
- T-series can’t do peek and hide or ultilize gun depression
Flanking is a no go for Chally 2
CQB is a no go for T-series
Yet Abrams can do those strategy better then most of their counterparts


