Aussies whining??
Colour me surprised… not!
The US has a tree in game. The Australians do not. It’s that simple.
Which is why Britain acts as the Commonwealth tree, and what’s your proposal on the T-90 that’s coming to Britain? Does that need to go to the USSR?
I have a major issue with copy and paste subtree but Finland is a subtree, Australia is not. The British tree already has the South Africa sub tree.
It should be in the USSR tree but at least the Indians built it under license. The Australians don’t even build it under license.
HMMMM I WONDER WHAT TIE THERE IS BETWEEN THE UK, SOUTH AFRICA, AND ALSO SOME OTHER COUNTRIES, OF WHICH AUSTRALIA IS ONE OF?
4 Likes
When do Aussies even whine?
I don’t have any words
The Australians are not a subtree.
1 Like
Britain is not a subtree of USA, why are there British vehicles in there?
1 Like
I know you’re going to pretend you’ve always held this stance, because you’ve realised how much of a hypocrite it makes you look, but I’m sure if I went through your comment history I would find you’ve never once mentioned this as an issue.
1 Like
Every time someone beats them :)
Do they need one?
Considering gaijin clearly wants most nations to have one, and they already gave the US the M1A1 AIM (of which the M1A1 AIM is a US tank, it’s not made by the Aussies or anything… the one in game is just based on an Aussie one.)
…yeah they would need a replacement. What would it be?
I mean there’s nothing amazing about squadron vehicles. They’re basically just TT that can be researched without reaching the top. As a US main myself, we have enough vics. Besides, we have 2 as it stands anyway
I’m just saying it would need to be replaced and asked what people thought could go there
It was so nice of the Americans to let us call the Holden an Australian car. ~ Clive James.
MiseryIndex556’s double standards and flawed logic would suggest he just doesn’t like Australia and this has absolutely nothing to do with War Thunder.
Here’s a perfect solution, REBRAND and RESKIN the squadron M1A1 AIM as an American tank from the American forces, then REPURPOSE the Australian skin of it as an Australian M1A1 AIM to be added to Great Britain as either a premium, event vehicle or, most preferably, as part of an Australian tech tree expansion/addition to Great Britain.
2 Likes
Gaijin don’t hate Australia, if someone hates everyone then he hates none, so they just in favor of Russia
Yes we do, can you not read. Or do you simply ignore reality when it is inconvenient.
I’ll say it again, ALL Australian military equipment is owned by the King. ALL Australian military personnel are employed by the King.
ALL British military equipment is owned by the King. ALL British military personnel are employed by the King.
To say that there is no Australian tech tree would require the same consistency to acknowledge that the Challenger 2 for example [along with the entire British tech tree] is NOT owned by the British Government or the British people, it is owned by the King. So to flip this while retaining the same consistency, ALL vehicles should be removed from the British tech tree simply due to the fact that Britain as a nation does not own or operate any of the equipment, The King owns the equipment and his militaries operate it; as far as the the King cares, there is no functional difference between his military operating in Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, ect.
Consistency is all that is been asked for.
3 Likes