Never understood why only the LMUR’s get an attack path, while pars, AGM-179 all get a direct path, even tho in real life they are known to have a top attack path with a lot of loft, I dont want to be that guy but this MAY be another undocumented case of Russian bias but I cant tell.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuuQrTKzjYQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I66vtgUvPyg
If anyone’s got a source on the pars, would be nice if you dropped it.
Because they are not russian duh
The funny thing is, this might literally be the the genuine answer
“direct path” lmao. If they took a “direct path” as you say, they would almost never hit targets. Before speaking on a topic, do your research, including on in-game implementation.
But if you use laser versions of those 179’s they got a lot more lofted attack , least they got when that apache came out.
Havent tested it in a while.
PARS 3 and Hellfire lofting profiles had been reported to Gaijin years before the LMUR was added, but only the LMUR has a good lofting/top-attack profile so yeah, it honestly would seem to be the the genuine answer lmao.
because of one value
LoftTargetOmegaMax. its almost 4 on the LMUR but 0.85 on the PARS and JAGM.
Bug report for PARS to have top attack (no label)
for the purposes of explanation, his words were correct.it is you who misunderstood.
all AGMs like JAGM, PARS etc, have a more or less direct attack angle near the target. doesnt matter if they loft in initial flight phase or not.