Why do people say the M1A2 is bad / underperforms

Like i got the M1A2T for China since a few Days and had to put it on a low-level Crew and i already find it unspaded better than any of Chinas own MBTs. Like i got Ace grinded on the 99A with over 500+ Matches in it but the M1A2T is already much better lol

i think once i got it spaded its going to be even better than the A5/A6 leopard

1 Like

You don’t need to think, it’s easily better than 2A5 when spaded.

1 Like

The main argument is that the protection of the armor is lacking and should be more survivable. With the armor still very much classified they give it poor values in protection.

the sep and the sep V2 being the worst as they are massively heavy with reduced maneuverability and the added armor really doesnt do anything for them. Its only really viable against chemical rounds which no one plays at that br

1 Like

This…gaijin is coping how do you go from the M1A2 to the SEP V2 with an added 10000 pounds of weight but no more armor lol

Yeah but its still so much better than most other MBTs

like try out the vt4a1/99a for some matches and then the m1a2, m1a2 is miles better in everything but mobility and the traction i noticed is sometimes kinda weird

They say it is bad because they are bad. Simple as.

The M1A2 SEP and SEPv2 would be amazing if you could delete the TUSK kit (without losing the composite sideskirts) and the turret ring was volumetric.

Abroooms is already strong it’s just that Leopard 2A7 and Strv 122 are brainless strong in comparison with better everything except reload rate (which is a plus for the abroooms)