Your want to paint it out as nasty is misplaced, and manipulative.
Well, it makes it even worse for you because that, is rather insulting at the end of it anyways…
Again with the claims and proof nonsense… If you were true to your word then you would have discussed, and if you were that confident in your discussion skills, you’d not have needed to pull the stats in the first place…
But you weren’t, and you aren’t, hence everything being a constant barrage on anything I say.
Their expectation of gameplay isn’t anything that defines why it should be changed though, and that’s the problem with USI sufferers…
I did and provided evidence to back up most if not all of my claims. There is no reason to talk about imaginary things as if someone can’t back up their own claims they are just empty words.
If You provided anything to back up Your own claims then no one would be talking about stats in first place, since You didn’t that was the only way to check if what You are saying is even true.
Are you raging Bro ? : )
You didn’t provide anything other than your scoreboards showing you playing a plane unabated… It doesn’t make the argument you think you want it to…
Are you sure you’re not confusing yourself? I think you are confused by what you’ve read, so please, read it again…
See earlier posts about the inherent imbalance between CAS and SPAA.
Completely different subject with little to no relation.
Like a lot of videos showcasing what I’m talking about?
How C&F works, how SPAAs can be destroyed outside of their effective range, how 12.7/20mm on planes are enough to deal with ground units? Yea, nothing at all.
Real in-game examples and situations and showing that it is not just a fluke made in one battle.
It is sad to see, because they refuse to acknowledge anything and expect blind support of their demand rather than true discussion…
Which is what leaads us back to the topic itself, rather than what suggestion is wanted or good or will do anything.
It’s quite ironic to be real, that this is what it becomes, to show what the true issue is.
I looked at the top players in the world a while ago and you were on page 1 at about number 20 on the planet.Was that you or am I confused.I am sure it said ULQ LOVER, did I get that wrong?
HA… Totally related…
And see the other posts pointing to new SPAA being on the way… There are other solutions, but you don’t want those ones, you just want your wanted one, and no objection or opposition to it…
Which still don’t change anything for people who want to just play tanks.
I don’t have as much time now to play WT so I probably fell off the ranking. Being an automation engineer gives You ton of benefits in exchange for Your time.
Good thing the game isn’t that.
Either way it was you wasn’t it? So accusing you of being elitist is like accusing Muhammad Ali of strutting around thinking he is hard when he is world champion lol
But there is a portion of people who would like it to be that way, same with people playing air modes.
That’s pretty dishonest… It’s elitist to gatekeep over stats and making out that it has anything to do with discussion…
But here you are sockpuppeting and egostroking with a tad of flex as per usual…
“USA suffers”, the vast majority of the time, is about the perception that US vehicles are worse than their counterparts in other nations. For example, F-15C vs J-10A.
With no guarantee of their performance, how many countries will get them, or even when we’ll get them. And of course, new top tier SPAA won’t help all the tiers below it.
Which I’ve addressed and pointed out how they don’t actually fix the issue and why I don’t want them.
Except SPAA driving outside regular map borders, because that’d be funny and I want to drive my Type 93 around to dubious locations.
With TO around, we could have combined EC gameplay tested which would really make things interesting. Imagine bigger games where people would fight for airfields/supply lines etc.
Ahhhhh… READ IT AGAIN…
USI… Unwarranted Self Importance…
Honestly, I do have to wonder how much you guys actually read whats said rather than trying to merely contrarianism it up because I dared to post.
Never heard of that. Doesn’t sound relevant.