When analogy is not correct, it proves nothing
1 Like
Its the same issue. Kh-29’s are not compatible by default like the Chinese AGMs, even though they both transmit TV signals.
The JH7 systems need to be modified in order to support them.
And you have to prove that more than 2 pylons were modified like that
Fine. Someone come here to provide Su30SM can carry kh38 or T84 can shoot BTA4 then. or just prove to us PGZ-09 using the same search radar as tunguska. provide to us chinese heli RWRs can only identify S-125 S-75 and Tor. When any other countries’ RWR can identify CS/SA-5 even they never faced this AA system.
And you know what? Why players want that russian weapon on their JH-7A? cause GAIJIN refuse to give Chinese missiles to them.even this aircraft can carry C802B/C701.Just think about a rafale without AASM, a typhoon without brimstone, a su 30/34 without Kh38.
The only reason gaijin give some ammo to some vehicle or not (or even any choise in this game) is their preference. They don’t need to provide anything to justify their choise. Besides even if player exactly provide something they still won’t change it, just like the spall liner of chinese MBTs.
And they may never understand what players’ data are talking about. Just like J-11B can carry a unrestraint pylon to carry CM400AKG and the ISSUE managers refuse to recognize it.
To be honesty. GAIJIN’s prove rule - GAIJIN never need to prove anything, and players have to prove everything - is just kind of bully against players. And just like some people will preserve a tyrant. Some players also reserve this rediculous rule, they are repeating GAIJIN must know everything about the vehicles they throwed to their game by some how some way. But this reserve is only kind of propaganda and won’t convince players whois tired with this freaking rule.
5 Likes
As I said if a analogy is not right .It proves nothing.
You just show us you don’t know anything about type c. And nothing about JH7. but just repeating what you think it’s right and you can’t prove it at all.
2 Likes
The issue here is you still can’t prove the Jh7 can carry 4 KH29’s
Gaijin never hesitates to discriminate against China
I think there should be some leeway when adding modern classified stuff especially from countries like China for game balance reasons, it makes no sense to be so strict about proof when most specs of modern weapons and vehicles in game are completely made up because there is simply no source of information. What we know about the Jh7 is that it is compatible with the Kh29, but we only have photographs of it carrying 2 (or even just 1), but we also have photographs of it carrying 4 TV guided Chinese missiles, so i think that is enough proof for 4 kh29 compatibility at least until certain proof comes out against that.
Gaijn already uses this logic btw, they added the Kh-38MT to the Su-30 while the only photographic evidence of it being carried by a plane is on an SU-34, same goes the PGMs on the Mirage 2000-5f and RMV, those variants never carried that weapon but export variants did.
there is no photographic evidence of the existence of Kh-38MT
those very much look like a mock up
Yes but the damage radius still does not match with the explosive mass
They’re going through and changing the damage radius’s of all the explosives, nothing is final with the current dev server
I think you should consider that the actual explosive mass could be less than 8% of the total warhead mass for SAP-HE warheads, it would be in line with others.
The CM-502KG is clearly not meant for heavy armor, and it accurately reflects this ingame
When GAIJIN cannot prove Su-30SM can use KH-38MT(which is maybe not even exist. It’s not my duty to prove JH-7A can use 4* Kh29(China even never bought Kh-29T but KH-29TE only)
CM502KG is now pure HE instead of SAP-HE
I have no clue if this is better or worse
Should not realistically change anything.
Only possible change would be the physical KE pen of the missile but such was not relevant to begin with.
Obviously, the cm502 uses far more than 4.5 kg of explosives with a high explosive warhead.From never being real to being completely detached from reality
1 Like
I feel a little bit better. Now you can destroy 3 to 4 targets, if you fire your 8 missiles at 8 different targets in the test drive, instead of the previous 0 to 1 target, this is still not satisfactory for a 12.3BR missile.
2 Likes