Why is it that both are semi-armor-piercing warheads, but the charge coefficient of the LmUR is 7% higher than that of the CM502KG? Moreover, the CM502KG has a 11kg pure high-explosive warhead. Why would a semi-armor-piercing warhead with a lower charge coefficient be given? In the live demonstration, this missile couldn’t even destroy the 10.7 Leopard 2A4. It needs to be strengthened.
68 Likes
The warhead weight is not the same as the explosives weight
If it has a SAP-HE effect, then it also has a relatively thicker shell around it compared to just HE warheads
6 Likes
The 4.52 kg warhead of this semi-armor-piercing high-explosive ammunition is far too weak. During the live stream, it was observed that a hit on a Leopard 2 main battle tank only damaged one observation device. Based on what I have seen, the CM502KG still cannot compete as a viable weapon in top-tier battles. I strongly request that its high-explosive coefficient be adjusted to match that of the Product 305 missile.
32 Likes
However, both the 305 and 502 are SAP-HE. So we can compare them.
1 Like
You can, and the SAP pen will vary, by impact velocity for example
In this case the higher top speed of the LMUR will play a role
1 Like
The speed is not correct
26 Likes
fake,the handbook said its speed from 0.6M to 0.85M,gaijin just pick the lowest speed
15 Likes
Whenever it comes to Chinese systems, the data is always taken as the lowest value. This is not a one-off or two-off incident but happens frequently.Meanwhile, in the test server, Chinese vehicles are always the least complete.Moreover, a lot of the data are merely skin-deep adaptations of other vehicles rather than relatively realistic. At the same time, they also resort to underhanded tactics in various places. Such a face is truly disgusting.
24 Likes
Being treated differently is frustrating
7 Likes
Take a look at this Japanese technology tree. The new VT4 model in the Chinese series is exactly the one that is being exported to Thailand. Originally, it was planned to be included in the Japanese technology tree, but the attitude of Chinese players made the game developers abandon this idea. Instead, they placed it in the Chinese technology tree, but its performance is not as good as that of the MBT2000 at 11.7. Haha. At the same time, the T84 does not have the ability to fire the BTA4 (BTA4 is a foreign trade ammunition sold by China. The T80UD from Pakistan has had its loading mechanism modified to be compatible, but Thailand did not purchase BTA4 and did not modify the loading mechanism, so it is incompatible. ) Also, China’s DTC10-125 has a situation where the penetration depth is poisoned. The tungsten carbide tail rod at the rear end is not included in the penetration length.
21 Likes
Cm502kg just unplayable now…
3 Likes
In fact, the Chinese top-tier tanks have been designed with a supporting role in mind. Meanwhile, the release of new content for the Chinese line is often aimed at paving the way for other lines and diverting player attention. For instance, the infrared jammer for the Z-10ME was implemented several days after it entered the tech tree, which was clearly to divert attention from the Mi-28NM. Similarly, the M60A3TTS in the Chinese line received the DM33 instead of the more powerful DM63, which was also to pave the way for the upcoming M60 in the Japanese line.
6 Likes
Same with agm-179MR it hit the leopard 2 times and only a crit the second time i think… and it is insanely slow
2 Likes
The official data is not trustworthy. What you think is the truth. Arrogance and prejudice.
1 Like
check the image that upload by me。you can see the flight speed is MA0.6 to 0.85. i don’t know why they chose the MA0.6
3 Likes
the agm179MR should have the speed of 500m per second or something like that but in the dev it was 340 i think… another example of gajin nerfing us
2 Likes
Looking at statcards and some footage of how missile (CM502KG) behaves, there is some problem with HE-Frag damage to light vehicles. It should overpressure them instead of just taking out 50% of modules.
However, those who say that TNTeq is too low for an 11 kg warhead are wrong. Given the missile’s warhead is SAP-HE (or semi-armor-piercing blast-fragmentation), the warhead cannot be made of pure explosives: it has kinetic penetrator for direct armor penetration and either pre-fragmented pieces or body is made of sturdy material used for frag damage upon shattering from blast.
LMUR missile’s warhead is 25kg heavy (unlike CM502 11kg), yet its explosive filler is 12kg, which is <50% of total mass, thus CM502KG explosive filler weight just cannot be full 11kg.
6 Likes
now its LMUR > AGM179 > CM502KG lmfao
1 Like
502kg should have more pure high-explosive