Yea go take a look at the Chinese MBTs. Do u really think gaijin took the effort into researching and making them?
1 Like
No. Hence why I said
But will gaijin actually buff them? This isn’t the first time people has asked for a buff or balance. Gaijin does little to change it EACH time it is brought up
1 Like
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Probably not. I mean, Type 10 has been broken since its been added and nothing has changed. Same with Ariete and Challenger 2s (+Merkava). I still think it’d be much better if Gaijin balanced and buffed rather than C&P that doesn’t fill a role in the tree.
Well seeing that gaijin is going to do absolutely little to nothing to fix the issues (they didn’t even add spall liners that they themselves said they would). I think that something like Abrams and oplot can fill the gap and strengthen the Chinese top tier for now.
2 Likes
M1A2T definitely, Oplot doesn’t really change the tree. It is ALSO badly modelled honestly is a waste coming as a Squadron. imo Trialed/Tested vehicles should come as events, not permanent additions.
^Most the discussion abt Oplot’s bad modelling is here
1 Like
Can you figure out what kind of Chinese toptier MBTs we still don’t have and are much better than the current?
1 Like
MBT-3000/VT-4 (P), ZTQ-15, VT-5*, ZTZ99B, ZTZ99A2 (With APS (?)), and the new ZTZ99 they’re working on for the future.
As for actual Pakistani vehicles;
Haider, T-80UD/DU2 or DU3, Al-Zarrar
*I dont know if the one in game we have is VT-5BD or regular VT-5
Thats just from memory and some googling. I’m not going to act like a professional on these vehicles because I’m not. Also I’m still for the Oplot-P and it having its actual model and correct design, but I’ll still say I find it lazy and sloppy to add it rather than to fix existing vehicles.
3 Likes
Some racism word
Should’ve just gave Thailand the VT4 and PRC/ROC the M1A2T (along with the VN-1C for both) at the same time to ease the headache. The Oplot-P is a stretch, I hope they at least make it unique looking like:
And to add into the earlier debate, Singapore for China is an extreme stretch and shouldn’t happen since they can get access to different-Western vehicles through the ROC as well as PRC export vehicles.
6 Likes
We do have VT-4, VT5, and ZTZ99As; the only difference is that they have different equipment, like APS or something, the armor, ammunition, and mobility don’t have any big improvement. which will sounds like other kinds of C&P
1 Like
Oplot-P in game right now is literally just the Oplot-T model, therefore C&P. The actual real Oplot-P looks different, therefore not C&P.
EIther way, you asked for vehicles could come to Chinese Top tier and those are the ones that can come. I’d still rather them fix the current ones in game as if they’re implemented correctly then they’d be actually competitive. When other nations get decent APS and better vehicles I’m down for those to be added. The current APS’ sit on vehicles that aren’t very good in the first place (T-72B3, Merkava, Challenger 2, etc.)
1 Like
They don’t need sht that doesn’t belong to them.
2 Likes
There have been many configurations of the VT-5 shown. Its a customizable export package.
This is the Bangladesh VT-5 we have in game
This is a heavier VT-5 config
This is another even heavier VT-5 config
And theres more out there
1 Like
+1 to those two
do u consider urself african?
1 Like
it does belong to them tho. republic of china owns the m1a2t, thus the chinese tech tree gets it. very easy to understand :))
3 Likes
Great so Japan should get VT-4 Thai own it and Thailand is sub tree of Japan it also easy to understand yes?
1 Like
yes bravo, btw youre the one screeching about who deservers what, not us
2 Likes
Damn right i do Chinese TT don’t deserve any foreign vehicle if nobody can’t get theirs
It called fair game.