Just wondering btw and since Japan already got an Oplot-t
They want to give China something, and while still a bad option, this oplot has the least controversy surrounding it.
Should definitely be tech tree of event though
Japan has a chance to receive it VT-4 next few update.
This one’s gonna get deleted too…
Ok that’s nice
U mean the new Oplot-P ?
Oh ok
Nah, ur post.
The argument surrounding this particular vehicle (oplot) is not the same as the VT-4, since Oplot’s main problem is Pakistan never used it, but only on trial. However as sweden has the precedent of getting vehicles from just trails this is less solid of an argument. The main issue of VT-4 and Abrams is more of a geopolitical one, and also partially historic, as to why Chinese players objected VT-4 to Japan so strongly. Abrams wise most people simply hold it as a thing that should hold even, China gets M1A2T only if Japan gets VT-4 simultaneously. Although it could be said ROCA isn’t China’s subtree.
I was just wondering cuz Japan already got an Oplot but yea ur right about the argument is not the same with the VT-4
No I mean this thread. I just had one deleted for the same question but different tanks.
Good luck!
oh ok
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
why is japan getting a vt4 when china cant have a leo2sg
Because thailand use the vt4, and thailand is already a sub tt in japan.
Singapore is not in the chinese tt yet so whats your point?
leo2sg was datamined for china, people threw a fit, it was cancelled. vt4 was datamined for japan, people threw a fit, it was cancelled. seems pretty fair to me add leo2sg back to china and vt4 can goto japan
Preach
well the nation for the vt4(thailand) was already in game which wasnt the case for the leo2sg.
and the leo2sg was canceled bcmost players didnt understand why china is getting a leopard2 to begin with(adding only for copy paste balance) and chinese players didnt want it bc they fear if the leo2 is ingame their toptier tanks do not get bugfixes. atleast this is my understanding why the leo2sg is viewed this badly since there was pretty much only talk about adding a leopard(could be wrong tho with this one).
You know what’s worse, pakistan never bought the oplot.
It participated in a trial, they instead bought the vt4 as cheaper option.
This means gaijin is now adding vehicles which participated in a nation’s trails to please chinese player…
so like how sweden has the t-80u/mi28 which were trialed and never bought? or the 1000 prototypes in the game that were tested and never adopted?
And that is not a good thing, or do you actually support this sloppy reasoning?
Do you realise every tech tree will have every vehicle if trials are used as a reason to add something to a particular tech tree. The game is already headed to a bad direction with the recent double standards…