Correct, they don’t. But in game the auto loader is protected by wet stowage modifier so the russian tanks don’t explode like they should. And that came directly from the devs, despite it being entirely wrong.
You just admitted that in-game they don’t have wet storage, then flip-flopped & incorrectly state they do.
Sorry, they don’t.
Interesting that you compliment DSD as a non-biased person.
& the fact that you admit you’ll falsely report peoples’ posts as spam for criticizing Russian equipment is hilarious.
DSD & you should get along since you both love Russia so much.
The answer is actually much simpler.
Soviet vehicles have low skill cap, but worse potential
Nato vehicles have high skill cap, but higher potential.
Average player in this game is horrible, so when they play NATO they never max out the potential, so it ends up being worse than Soviet performance.
Why should Soviet tanks that have insanely inferior everything else lose their only thing that makes them usable?
He didnt state it was autoloader ammo with the modifier, whats your proof entiriety of the ammo has it?
I just shown it was a suggestion and not a proven thing.
Funny, you are just being pointless there. You are also literally the one spamming same image which doesnt relate to the topic.
Never even stated russian stuff (or Russia, lol)was best, the best they ever had died in prototype stages just for them to result to cheaper solutions lol. The mistakes from 60s follow their tanks to this day.
My statement about it being an unproven thing is also supported by this guy lol. Though without proof too.
and this, right there is why no one takes your claims seriously
agreed with lorentz tho, all spaa are easy to hunt, i dance all other the place with my 2000 without any problem.
A competent pantsir player can intercept my bombs or AGMs however, but most of the time, they’re not even looking at me, even when I’m alone in the sky.
Saying a pantsir is equivalent to a flakrakrad or even ito is laughable however
but that’s a larger CAS vs SPAA problem, so off topic
2 Likes
I agree with all your statements.
You agree with me that CAS can’t be touched by essentially everything, tho not addressing the fact that TOR-M1 touches CAS.
You make an example of some Pantsirs defending themselves but still unable to kill the CAS targeting them [haven’t had any target my munitions yet personally tho I’ve seen some YouTube videos].
And last you mention me forgetting that one of my favorite trucks exists cause I wrote that after playing air all day so aircraft was on my mind instead. My bad, should’ve remembered Flarakrad. To be fair, I also forgot the name ADATS as well. Remembering names is hard.
You didn’t need to include the insult.
1 cap, 1 kill. Easy enough my man.
Until you realize that a M60A1 with M392A2 can still penetrate and kill the T-64A at all the usual weak spots. LFP, Driver optics, mantlet. The Chieftain also already gets that matchmaking(8.7 vs T-64 at 9.3) and is capable of going straight through the T-64A UFP with its powerful L15A3.
The T-64A isn’t the monster you think it is.
The point is if BR year was a thing that would make things like 8.3 fight 9.3 but on same BR. Even if M60a1 can penetrate its UFP, that still leaves T-64 with better speed, better rounds, better turret armour, (better UFP armour yet it doesnt really matter). Or for example M24(3.7)seeing King Tigers(6.7). Or swedish PVKV(3.7-5.0) tanks meeting early T-54s.(7.7) Or T34-1942 fight Tiger 1s.
Turret armor doesn’t matter one bit when M735 struggles just as much to penetrate the turret as M392A2 which is something you’re apparently not understanding. The weak spots would, for the most part, stay the same while Soviet teams would get bombed to oblivion by planes they can barely counter.
Soviet mains wishing for historical matchmaking because of the Wunderwaffe T-64A really aren’t as smart as they think.
You are literally one suggesting idea here or DocUSMC, one of you is. Plus historical matchmaking is german mains thing.
You completely ignore what i have said.
1 Like
Which originally was an answer to you starting here but okay:
PS: M46 and the T-54 were at a similar BR for years and the M46 had no problem fighting the T-54(thx heatfs) and was in fact often considered the better tank due to its crazy mobility. I’m not even sure why it still is 7.0. Not only that but the M47 and M48 would also be part of the matchup, the two of them being more than a match for the -54. You might not see it but we have a somewhat historical matchmaking in many areas right now.
The one starting it was DocUSMC with his discussion on planes needing to be given BRs by their years.
You do understand you ignore other nations being stuck with not much to put against it, PVKV 3 for example is 1950s vehicle. PVKV 4 is 1952 vehicle at 3.7 RN. Plus M46 is 1949 vehicle which would put it against 1949 T-54s, early ones dont have enemy of M46 if they are considered to be the top year in battle
M47 is same year as 1951 T-54, M48 is one year older than T-54.
Sweden would have the Centurion and the Finnish T-54. PVKV can be rebranded into light tanks and be given near-free spawn point costs. There would be many ways to introduce a proper historical matchmaking if you stop comparing these tanks in a 1v1 vacuum for just a second. A task you seemingly struggle with, no offense.
Put them all in some kind of early 50s matchmaking. Done.
On the soviet tanks seemingly lacking spalling for most shells it seem they might have forgoten to turn it off from CL3143 because that shell has been reliably oneshotting T80BVMs with som questionably placed shots.
While DM53 from the ariete into the ammo carousel has sometimes oneshotted but alot of the times soviet tanks need like 2 or more shots
You are the one stuck with M46-M60s, i was the one to include at least some other examples and tanks, lol.
They re really slow and some are unpleasent to play even at their BRs.
STRV 81 would struggle, Strv 101(Centurion mk 6 ) is 1959 vehicle)
Finnish T-54 is model 1951, leaving 1947-1949 mot facing those in top conditions.
it does though eventually go difrent like how at top tier it would be M1A2 Sep v3 or 2 with M829A3 or 4 Leopard 2A7 and things like that
Yes, but my point is it would be double sided for everyone.
I just want my ariete PSO pt 2 with PSO package and War kit with actual ability to stop atleast 3bm42
2 Likes