??
I was replying to this guy right here. You can look it up either by my comment history here or just by following arrows to replied comments.
@Balanced_Game
Thank you for this link. I have some morons to bash over the head with it.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. You haven’t even bothered to play anything but russian vehicles:
I am not even going to bother dissecting how incredibly wrong you are at nearly everything. Not worth the time wasted.
Key point, is in game. The Mig 29 is over performing, the F16 is under performing. Currently it is sitting at 12% and 16.5% less thrust than it should have, and has entirely the wrong loadout. Same for the Netz and Barak as well. No need to continue to beat this dead horse. We know its because the snail is bias and refuses to make all things equal.
The same reason why russia has now spent 3 full years with the best win rates in the game. 3 years… Its a joke. Its why I refuse to spend money on the game, that and their support of the war.
It is probably also important to note that the M1A1 and M1A2 variants all have ammo detonation set to 50%.
Also how about a Bradley, S-tank, and Abrams with ERA:
russia has lost 2,100 tanks in Ukraine. Their ERA doesn’t work. They are being destroyed by older vehicles with outdated ammunition. All those bribes and shotty production is coming back to bite them. What did they say, 3 days? Yeah, how did that work out? The T-14 that “saw combat” but from “the back lines to protect it”… Because its all fluff and fake.
They aren’t even proving to have that much protection IRL… The tanks jack in the box like no other.
2 Likes
And War Thunder’s protection is equal.
Your point?
You have provided zero sources and havent adressed any argument you have been given, you also have been purely political the whole time. All you really did was just watch some random Internet guy’s vehicles.
Really shows whats important for you.
1 Like
Bad link.
Use the search function. I have provided documentation to multiple problems in the game. Bug reports, issues etc. What hasn’t been proven is the magical performance of russian vehicles. The snail claims “sekrit dokuments” while we provide actual proof and get ignored.
It’s pretty clear the game has an integrity problem.
But again, you can use the search function. As you are not important enough to try to explain it all over again with sources.
Idk, ask your General Milley.
Entirely wrong? And what is “entirely wrong”?
He probably believed what we all believed to be true before the war. Who would have expected that it turns out like this. I would have given UKR 72 hours back then. I guess almost all overestimated Ru and believed what they made us to believe about their armed forces and equipment.
Or… Maybe, just maybe, you (and actually everyone) underestimated someone?
You havent provided proof towards spalling being disabled for soviet tanks, havent provided source towards your claim about ERA overperforming (people who corrected you actually gave the source lol) You have been purely political and ignorant to the arguments given. You didnt even oay attention to the fact war thunder uses 3rd party companies for ads and the ad wasnt even in the war but on military channel.
Havent proven this either, quite the opposite, in game code shows same chance as any other tank.
The only links i have seen from you were from political sites.
This is also BS because secondary spall is just bonus spalling, which is on only for Leopard 2 A6 gun mask as well as STRVs, on any other nation its off. Without secondary spall its impossible to break the breach.
https://reddit.com/r/Warthunder/s/tY46rLNCXB
This basically proves you completely wrong, and confirms my words.
1&2 - not ingame, not missing, will be added when every other nation receive their capable plane.
3 - Not needed, too moder, will be added when all other nations receive their counter-parts,
4&5 - Anti-radar rockets are not ingame as whole
6, 7, 8 - will be not different from D ingame, same for H, idk about K.
9 - Too modern, but maybe could aded.
10 - WHy you need Paveway 2, when you have Paveway 3?
11, 12, 13 - source?
14 - not needed.
15, 16, 17, 18 - Okay, cluster ones can be added maybe, but i dont see too much practical use for them
21 and 22 - Snakeye ingame already.
23. Mk151 - idk what is this
24, 25, 26, 27 - targeting pods?
28 and 29 - source?
30 - No, its absolutely adequate.
and actually for all others - SOURCE.
1 Like
R77 came out in 2002. The Aim-120 came out in 1991. This game should see the Aim-120 for at least a year before the R77 launches.
Not to mention you are talking about missing 2 pieces of ordinance vs missing more than 2 dozen. That isn’t a comparison.
Also, just to knock all that other crap down… This is how dumb things are with the super power russian vehicles, straight from the devs…
1 Like
Chaps - don’t entertain the Krembots. Derailing threads and getting into circular arguments that go nowhere suits them just fine.
Meanwhile, in the time it takes for you read this sentence - another T-72 / T-80 in the real world has probably lost it’s turret to outer space… :)
And another day of bringing up the same stuff, that was already explained…
Have you not understoof year BRs/armarment are horrible idea?
I mentioned myself that im not mentioning everything just because i dont want to bother to, as it was to example it wasnt just american aircraft to lack weaponry it had/has.
Autoloader has no wet storage, but fuel tanks do count as it.
Soviet tanks don’t have wet ammo storage on the carousel, stop spreading wrong information.