So yeah, they already have the model
they have had it for 3 years…
I keep my dream of a Canadian tree and you get your lavs…
Deal?
1 Like
Not my decision unfortunately
😣😣
1 Like
Hmm?
Awwww
I’m just surprised to see this many messages unread, usually it isn’t that much unless an argument happened or news was revealed (I wager the former happened).
As usual, we Canadian don’t want to be in the US tree and Americans want our vehicles
Not new
2 Likes
They really do perform well when I use them, the ODLing is what makes them seem like bad tanks.
1 Like
It would be quite stupid for it to goto the US considering almost every other aussie vehicles in the British tree.
As well considering it’s of Canadian design the Lav 2 the 25 is built upon.
2 Likes
US built Aussie vehicles should go to the US.
The British tree shouldn’t have gotten F/A-18s.
Edit: And Bushmaster vehicles without ATGMs should stay as far away from the game as possible.
As a Britain player I can tell you that I would prefer to see modern day vehicles operated by Canada to go to the US tree as well lol
The LAV 25 is built on the LAV2 which is canadian.
AS a britain player, with Canadian mates, and Aussie mates, no one wants modern day canadian equipment in the damn US tree.
2 Likes
Fair, those vehicles can just not be added then.
Don’t need more Commonwealth vehicles occupying space that British designs should fill.
Oh so it’s alright for Indian and SA stuff to fill it when realistically it shouldn’t either?
Canadian gear is more fitting alliance wise than indian:
we also need the british kit on top of that.
Why not both?
2 Likes
Most of it is pretty redundant. There’s a couple modern vehicles that are different enough and would fit/make sense in the US but not a ton
What like stingray? never used nor considered for use by the US yet is in the US tree?
Meanwhile the best hunter sits in Germany (just an example).
Best leopard sits in italy etc etc