Naaaa
Could say the same for England getting f18s, and Abrams…
That why I ask for a Canadian tree, nobody mad
And at the same time, giving the LAV 25 to the US tree
3 Likes
The only issue i run into is, if canada has joint LAV projects like the later LAV3 or stryker variants they need to be in both nations. My biggest issue is we see 30mm wheeled tanks in many nations but the US has yet to see any of their many home made light tanks.
The US can get every LAV they use irl, I wouldn’t be mad
But not all of them
1 Like
The US use the LAV 25, I never said that they can’t have it
i want the american LAVAT, LAV25, LAV AT late, stryker 30mm, stryker tow, stryker SHORAD, etc…
Yes?
you should know that LAV doesnt necessarily mean the LAV you are thinking of, it literally just means light armored vehicle
for example LAV-300 and 600
I talk about the basic for Canada, LAV 1,2,3 LAV coyotes and LAV 6.0
if a Canadian tree appears the USA will get the LAV they use
1 Like
Why we argue if we think the same
The only thing is, the inside components are identical to the american ones except for some american made mods. My worry is they will add a better Canadian one and wait for america to get there.
Well…I think if they add Canada, they would add some LAV in USA too
It would be a big update of light tanks
1 Like
Coyote and LAV 25 are not that different
As long as the USA used those vehicles, I have no objections that gaijin add them
1 Like
what makes them better?
Did the USA upgraded their stryker with time?
yeah, a lot
They will add better versions but wait to add the equivalent. AKA power creep
Because here in Canada we build only LAV soooo the 6.0 is the top of the top