I’m just surprised to see this many messages unread, usually it isn’t that much unless an argument happened or news was revealed (I wager the former happened).
As usual, we Canadian don’t want to be in the US tree and Americans want our vehicles
Not new
2 Likes
They really do perform well when I use them, the ODLing is what makes them seem like bad tanks.
1 Like
It would be quite stupid for it to goto the US considering almost every other aussie vehicles in the British tree.
As well considering it’s of Canadian design the Lav 2 the 25 is built upon.
2 Likes
US built Aussie vehicles should go to the US.
The British tree shouldn’t have gotten F/A-18s.
Edit: And Bushmaster vehicles without ATGMs should stay as far away from the game as possible.
As a Britain player I can tell you that I would prefer to see modern day vehicles operated by Canada to go to the US tree as well lol
The LAV 25 is built on the LAV2 which is canadian.
AS a britain player, with Canadian mates, and Aussie mates, no one wants modern day canadian equipment in the damn US tree.
2 Likes
Fair, those vehicles can just not be added then.
Don’t need more Commonwealth vehicles occupying space that British designs should fill.
Oh so it’s alright for Indian and SA stuff to fill it when realistically it shouldn’t either?
Canadian gear is more fitting alliance wise than indian:
we also need the british kit on top of that.
Why not both?
2 Likes
Most of it is pretty redundant. There’s a couple modern vehicles that are different enough and would fit/make sense in the US but not a ton
What like stingray? never used nor considered for use by the US yet is in the US tree?
Meanwhile the best hunter sits in Germany (just an example).
Best leopard sits in italy etc etc
Made by the US/Textron and they did consider it for AGS
I’m talking about there not being many modern Canadian vehicles that would make sense to go to the US that aren’t redundant
Canada should be part of britain tree but not as official subtree
While we’re at it dissolve Israel and make it US Subtree.
I’ve always been against the Indian subtree.
The South African stuff is fine by me because, unlike Canada and Australia, ZA is an official subtree.
Most Canadian jets are US built or barely changed Canadian built US designs and their ground vehicles are either German (Leos) or pointless additions (armoured cars with Bushmasters and nothing else).
It’s almost like most, if not all LAVs are redundant in both the US and British tree.
Neither of those trees needs more Bushmaster cars/tanks lol
As this chat is about, we could actually make Canada or Australia a sub tree, seeing as every aussie vehicle bar one is in the British tree.
You chatting on about British designs but are also absolutely sharting on anything that could also be a potential addition.
In your opinion which is subjective, right now britain has pretty damn poor light tanks.
Apart from AJAX what else can it get .
could it just be one of the disadvantages Britain just has? similar to how the US doesnt have a good top tier dogfight missile Britain doesnt have a good high/top tier light tank option
1 Like
Britain’s light tanks are fine.
The Warriors have ATGMs that are very useful at their respective BRs (unlike their autocannons) and both the Vickers 11 and VFM 5 are pretty good as well.
South Africa helps a lot with their Rooikat and have some more potential additions that would be much better than any of the LAVs that Canada has to offer.
The Ajax (at least in my opinion) isn’t really needed, but would be a neat addition, provided it comes with Javelins.
cmon we only have the Bradleys for the Bushmaster 25mm
isnt the event vehicle also bush 25mm?