I know Gaijin needs to gain the data feedback from players, but waiting for BR change is so long that even longer than a major update sometimes, most of time it may take 2-3 months, even longer, and then just a few of vehicles get balanced, does the BR really balanced? even players asked extend the BR so many times, the last ground vehicles BR extend is about 1 year ago. Naval? maybe 3 years ago( move to 7.0) now Air is already 13.7, what’s the plan of the ground? let leopard 2A5/6/7 at same BR or all M26 at same BR are pretty ridiculous.
2 Likes
I think we will see a ground br extension this years.
2 Likes
Cause they go off of data + analysis, which is more accurate than the biases of players.
Also naval isn’t to the modern age yet, so they can’t assess correctly where the current BBs will be.
Especially since missile cruisers are supposed to absolutely dunk on BBs.
The difference between 2A5 and 2A7 is pretty much front hull armor.
And M26 is effectively a slightly worse M46.
The fact T26E5 is still 6.7 is pretty funny though.
If M1A1 HC and M1A2 deserve different BR, then the 2A5 and 2A7 deserve different BR.
Sure, when Leopard 2A5’s best round is DM43.
This is not about Morden, due to some reason they made the naval like chaos, 16/15 inch guns vs 12-inch guns at the same BR, even though there are some special case like Scharnhors ( the fighting range makes 14-16 inch guns and heavy armor not so powerful or useful), DD and CA/CL also face such kind of issue.
M26E1/M26E1-1 at same BR, that’s much more funny, if the mobility could make them at same BR, then I suggest M4A3E8 and jumbo(76) at same BR
1 Like
Not only top tier, I really hope they can solve 7.0-9.0 issues, like those heavy tanks.
Let’s not even talk about coastal lol.
PT-15, Chikugo, and PT-808 all at same BR with vastly differing capabilities… And also PG-02.
Coastal has died, I have lost my hope after Gaijin remade the DM of ships
1 Like