But it is? o_O
They moved it up to 7.0 and buffed the RoF.
That’s what I’m saying, in response to the guy I replied to saying the Tiger 2 105 should be 6.7.
I feel like part of the problem is that many players want to see their heavys perform something like this:
4 Likes
The issue with Heavy Tank players are that they expect exactly this, it’s funny to watch yet another tiger 2 roll down a street towards a cap swarming with enemies simply expecting to bounce anything thrwn their way, only to die to a rogue APHE and go on to complain, none of them play strategically anymore and it shows.
2 Likes
You’re wrong then. I think it’s safe to say that NOBODY (literally, not a single person) here expects to get 50 K/D ratio playing a multiplayer game against other human players. Your post is equally dumb and insulting.
Congratulations.
1 Like
4 Likes
I hate American football.
4 Likes
So you are not a heavy tank player ? What do you play ? Navy ?
2 Likes
Top tier…
The Panzer IV F2 is famously under-BRed and should absolutely be a 3.7
3 Likes
Saying that they are not surviving against the T34s they face as it is so why raise them? They seem about right as they are.The T34 is bouncing shots like anything.
The Churchill will take hit after hit and some people get lucky like the one shot kill is a random prize after the spin of a wheel. Seems like the OP got unlucky and jumped on here to complain.Sweden seems to be where the OP vehicles are and Germany have to face them now. Sav is a fine example of an item to make the heavy feel redundant.
2 Likes
Laughs in stabilized sherman
2 Likes
Pz IV are on ok B.R. as their armor is weak.
They are just glass canons and I find them one of the weakest enemies to face. Not to mention that they can be easly destroyed with aircrafts using just MGs.
6 Likes
My issue with the long '50 is poor accuracy, to be honest. Its annoyingly inaccurate, andd I would take any brit/american/russian 75 over it.
also like the M10 exist lol
AB BRs for the Panzer IVs are pretty fine, to be honest, though the one with manual traverse could stand to go down about .3. T-34s and shermans are honestly fine from my experience, but the III-IV and the M4A3 (105) could go up.
Nope. The only “OP” one we have is the SAV, and that is a notoriously difficult one to balance- it would be best served by giving it its HE-VT, APDS and HEAT and moving it up in BR to around 6.7 or whatever. Stuff like the Pvkvs are really only snipers, their only advantage is bonkers optics. (And the Pvkv IV is just ass)
3 Likes
I only really play WW2 BR and find it all OK as it is.The only nation to have a couple of possibly OP vehicles is Sweden.Is see the Gun being good as you say but the T34s armour more than making up for that and the Sherman taking out its fair share of Panzer IVs.
I don’t really buy the OPs reasoning but I do see the issue at 6-7-8 BR where speed becomes a major issue as does the penning power of later cold war vehicles.
The game is almost over before you turn up.
Little point trundling around with heavy armour that meant something in 1944 only to face tanks from 1964 with 300 mm of pen.
1 Like
Yep, the problem comes around 7.0 → when it comes to heavies.
3 Likes
laughs in ikv 103
The armor still means something lol, I would take a KT II over a lot of those go-karts any day, especially due to APHE.
2 Likes
Yeah with HEATFS and 400mm of pen I am laughing too ,just played a load of games in it and the SAV ,another OP time traveler that should not be in any WW2 game really.No wonder you defend these things : )
1 Like
I’d rather pick the Pvkv m/43 it’s way better.
1 Like