I specificaly meant the amx 13 ss11 the others didn’t deserve to be higher than tiger II H
is it? my bad then, i must’ve never noticed it there
this is sarcasm right
Just Alvis’s usual contrarianism, access to better rounds, better suspension, mobility, profile, and secondary weapons apparently means the same BR
7 Likes
The AMX-13 is inherently worse than the EBR 1954 because of its horrible reverse vs. godlike.
Since the EBR was moved up while not having the APCBC, it probably means that next time the EBR is going to 7.3.
Then again it’s just that effective.
It runs circles around WW2 vehicles and has that super fast turret traverse speed.
1 Like
don’t mind me i’m just doing a little experiment
Point is, yes, those tanks can work at 10.0, but are they really worth 10.0 ? I don’t think anyone would argue that’s the case
Do you mean the one with 200mm pen solid AP round? Honestly, that thing is goated.
Truly this is a sign of French technological supremacy
1 Like
Give it time
Don’t forget 3 mgs, which includes a 50 cal.
1 Like
The AMX-13 in 7.0 is an insult.
should be 2 50cal actually